[meteorite-list] Accepting Inquiries From Accredited Scientific or Educational Institutions...
From: Sterling K. Webb <sterling_k_webb_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 14:42:34 -0500 Message-ID: <694620.74595.bm_at_smtp113.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> You are severely underpricing your punctuation. Really good comma's are worth at least two bucks a pair. A proper semi-colon should be $1.00 to $1.50. You should work up a detailed price list... Sterling Webb -------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Meteorite-list [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Galactic Stone & Ironworks via Meteorite-list Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2015 1:02 PM To: Peter Richards Cc: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com; Michael Farmer Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Accepting Inquiries From Accredited Scientific or Educational Institutions... I was trying to be genuinely helpful. And now I am reminded why I do not reply to these kind of inquiries. The messenger always gets shot. I tried in good faith to be helpful to you and you start launching accusations. The rest of your replies are too incomprehensible or paranoid to warrant a reply. This is my last reply on this matter. Any further replies will cost you $20 per sentence with punctuation being an extra .25 cents per period or comma. Payment in advance only. -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone ------------------------------------------------------------- On 6/7/15, Peter Richards <pedrichards at gmail.com> wrote: > Mike, I think your approach is great for novices. I know that not only > you but many professional meteoricists have your "hardline", barely > logical, if so, preconceived, "paper form" reply, when, of course, it > is an odd inheritor of the mantle of people who once said meteorites > did not even exist, which I believe Geoff Notkin has reported included > the heads of the Catholic church at one point historically. I get that > scientists, like you seem to me to, might prefer to discredit the > possibility than be honest, yet, again, it is what it is. My previous > statements are what they are. You can call them what you want, at the > behest of yourself or your friends or whoever motivates you to do what > you do. Of course, oddly enough, you seemingly disingenuous people are > leaning into this, and seem prepared to throw your all at me in such a > muckracking match, in lieu of the professionals. Really, I have some > emails from them, so it is the same. You all are what you are, the > rock is what it is (as previously described), and I am what I am, and > maybe I should have not been provoked by your message, and ignored it, > but, I have already written this and the "send" button is in sight, so > do not fight. I know how great you all are. I have explained what you > are doing. I don't know why. It does protect your financial interests, > and my writing the truth, and not being cowed by past "infidelities" > is my attempt to protect my own. > cordially, > Peter > P.S. There are no granite meteorites recognized/officially-known and > would it not be bizarre if some people had a bias towards wanting it > to stay that way? > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Galactic Stone & Ironworks > <meteoritemike at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> It's hard to tell from the photos, but I do not see any outward signs >> that would suggest these rocks might be meteorites. I do not see any >> fusion crust, and what I do see is probably desert varnish. Desert >> varnish forms on all rocks, not just meteorites. >> >> Have you done a streak test or specific gravity test? These are both >> low-tech tests that anybody can use to narrow down the range of >> possibilities. If the rocks fails the streak test, it's not a >> meteorite. If the rock has a specific gravity that falls outside the >> range for stony meteorites, then it's not a meteorite. >> >> You will find that most "accredited" institutions that work with >> meteorites do not accept unsolicited samples because of the sheer >> volume of rocks clogging the system waiting for analysis. >> >> My advice is to use the streak and specific gravity tests to help >> rule in/out the possibility of the stones being meteoritic or terrestrial. >> If the rocks pass these tests, then try cutting a window into one of >> them and see if there are any chondrules or metal flecks. >> >> Best regards, >> >> MikeG >> >> PS - there are no granite meteorites, so if the rock is "granite" >> then it is not a meteorite. >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com >> Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone >> Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone Pinterest - >> http://pinterest.com/galacticstone >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> On 6/7/15, Peter Richards via Meteorite-list >> <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> wrote: >>> Hello Michael, no, but I will pass the Actlabs information on to any >>> representatives of accredited institutions who inquire. The stone is >>> a granite, and the photos may not tell the story of the crust >>> glaringly, but it is apparently what is there, for those of us (me >>> only right >>> now) who have the privilege of holding the stone. Thank you for the >>> "bump" anyway, although, of course, I am wondering what your >>> intentions were. Anyway, again, you use official scale cubes, and >>> these animal sculptures are all I have right now, but I understand >>> that it is less than fully ideal, and, again, this is not a >>> commercial sale, so to Mr. Farmer's defence, he is not lowering the >>> price for some associate of his to buy. Yes, I am a real person and >>> an American citizen, and the rock is as it was described, and I am >>> sorry that some people want to tell me it is what sort of terrestrial rock by chance? >>> God knows. Keep looking if interested, and I will try to improve the >>> photos, but there is perhaps adequate visual information already. >>> regards, >>> Peter >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Michael Farmer >>> <mike at meteoriteguy.com> >>> wrote: >>>> What kind of Nigerian scam attempt is this email? Trying to sell >>>> garbage trinkets? >>>> A,asking what makes it on the list these days. >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPad >>>> >>>>> On Jun 6, 2015, at 8:48 PM, Peter Richards via Meteorite-list >>>>> <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> To whom it may concern, I am offering this link, for the benefit >>>>> of representatives of accredited educational and scientific >>>>> institutions, displaying a stone which an Actlabs (of Lancaster, >>>>> Ontario) report has identified to me as a granite, which, is >>>>> almost definitely meteoritic, which I say due to the distinct >>>>> coating, and its shape, given that I have not shaped or coated >>>>> this stone and that these traits appear in no way artificial. I >>>>> can only guess what value to anyone denying that this could be a >>>>> meteorite is, but I will have to preclude such proclamations by >>>>> reminding people that, unless I have truly missed something, there >>>>> is less evidence to support such a claim than there is to support my above-made claim. >>>>> Here is a link to a photo album, please see first photo >>>>> (sculptures are for scale reference, btw): >>>>> http://www.ipernity.com/doc/312101/album/793480 >>>>> I am gauging interest alone here, I do not suppose this counts as >>>>> an ad, for the purposes are less than commercial although I, of >>>>> course, would like to determine if it is legal for any grants, or >>>>> such things, to be given by any willing recipients of any material >>>>> I make available, to me, as a token of gratitude, to compensate >>>>> for my exertions while acquiring this, and to help me better >>>>> conserve what I have collected, in case there is indeed scientific >>>>> value belonging to this collection of mine, and, it is ultimately >>>>> up to Art whether or not this counts as an advertisement technically speaking. >>>>> Promptness will be much appreciated and rewarded where possible. >>>>> Once more, this is for accredited educational or scientific >>>>> institutions. I will hear of interest from outside the U.S., but >>>>> the state department's approval will be needed before anything is >>>>> provided to such institutions, as according to law. >>>>> Thank you and kindest regards to all, Peter E. D. Richards >>>>> currently of Chicago, IL >>>>> ______________________________________________ >>>>> >>>>> Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral >>>>> and the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>>>> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>> ______________________________________________ >>> >>> Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral >>> and the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>> > ______________________________________________ Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-listReceived on Sun 07 Jun 2015 03:42:34 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |