[meteorite-list] Pluto's Fate to be Decided by 'Scientific andSimp
From: Larry Lebofsky <lebofsky_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed Aug 16 00:13:54 2006 Message-ID: <1155699145.44e291c998e9e_at_hindmost.LPL.Arizona.EDU> Hi all: Depending on albedo, there could easily be Earth-sized bodies beyond the Kuiper Belt (do not remember the exact numbers off the top of my head but could find out). As far as perturbations are concerned, we are likely to be getting comets from the Oort cloud (that is how it was predicted) and these could knocked out of the cloud by passing stars the cloud goes out to nearly 1/2 an AU, so there are stars that do get faily close to that distance. Larry Quoting "E.P. Grondine" <epgrondine_at_yahoo.com>: > Hi Ron - > > When do we get back the tens of millions of dollars > spent looking for Nemesis? The NEO search teams could > really use it. There's those 64 fragments of SW3 > coming back around in 2022. Additionally there's a > pack of nuts all gearing up to holler about 2012, very > close to SW3's 2011 return. > > If I can get the money back, can I keep a percentage? > > good hunting, > Ed > > > > --- Ron Baalke <baalke_at_zagami.jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > > > > > > > Bigger than Pluto? At greater AUs'out? > > > > > > This could explain the comets that come out of the > > blue appear once and > > > never return. > > > > > > Did not astronomers think that it was interstellar > > perturbations that > > > "jarred" the K-belt? > > > > > > A large "planet(s)" out there would have much more > > effect than stars > > > light years away. > > > > > > > We would have seen evidence of a large planet by > > now, which we've haven't. > > Analysis by Myles Standish at JPL indicates that a > > large planet out > > beyond Neptune does not exist. Some astronomers > > have been searching > > for a Planet X based on what appeared to be > > irregularities > > in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune. However, when > > the extremely accurate > > measurements of the mass of Neptune made by the > > Voyager 2 flyby in 1989 > > are inserted in the equations, these irregularities > > vanish. Prior to the > > Voyager 2 flyby, the mass number used for Neptune > > was off by five-tenths > > of 1 percent. When the new value for Neptune's > > mass is factored into the > > equations, the orbits of the outer planets are shown > > to be moving as exp > > ected, going all the way back to the early 1800's. > > The results of Standish's > > analysis are published in the May 1993 issue of The > > Astronomical Journal > > > > Ron Baalke > > ______________________________________________ > > Meteorite-list mailing list > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > > > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > -- Dr. Larry A. Lebofsky Senior Research Scientist Co-editor, Meteorite "If you give a man a fish, Lunar and Planetary Laboratory you feed him for a day. 1541 East University If you teach a man to fish, University of Arizona you feed him for a lifetime." Tucson, AZ 85721-0063 ~Chinese Proverb Phone: 520-621-6947 FAX: 520-621-8364 e-mail: lebofsky_at_lpl.arizona.eduReceived on Tue 15 Aug 2006 11:32:25 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |