[meteorite-list] NWA 1110 issues

From: Bernhard <rendelius_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Sep 9 11:19:25 2004
Message-ID: <000501c4967f$ea184a90$a615170a_at_PDO>

Now, here's my point of view.

If NWA 1110 is paired with NWA 1068 (and thus should be paired with NWA
1183 as well), I think it is fraudulent to call anything else but these
118g NWA 1110.

But wait. Nothing should be called NWA 1110 then. I think that NWA 1110
should have been called NWA 1068 and those 118g should have been added
to the TKW of 1068.

The damage with NWA numbers has been done already. Noone kept track of
that stuff, right? One find may have been sold under 5-8 NWA numbers.
And nobody knows for sure.

Another example for this mess is NWA 984, right? Or NWA 904.

 
  _____

Best regards,
Bernhard "Rendelius" Rems

CEO RPGDot Network

 
This outgoing mail has been virus-checked.

-----Original Message-----
From: meteorite-list-bounces_at_meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces_at_meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Adam
Hupe
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 4:29 PM
To: MARK BOSTICK
Cc: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 1110 issues

Hello Mark and List,

I am not arguing that all of these fragments may be paired and I am not
saying that they did not all come from the same strewnfield. Read my
emails
more carefully. My problem with others using the NWA 1110 designation
is
that this number was reserved by us to cover an additional 118 grams
(not a
single gram more) and that this in the books, is official and final (no
more
can be added because it is a pairing). Every crumb officially and
legally
claimed to be NWA 1110 has been imaged, was authenticated by a scientist
and
submitted to the NomCom for approval. These other pieces being claimed
under NWA 1110 have not been authenticated. I would say this makes them
different. I assure you Mark this is no act, using proprietary data is
nothing short of infringement. What is to stop a crooked or uninformed
person from selling terrestrial pebbles as NWA 1110 if there are no
standards? What if somebody published your cartoons without first
getting
your permission? What if they drew a lousy cartoon and claimed you drew
it?
Using an air abrasion tool to clean up Zag does not make it Amgala.

All the best,

Adam



----- Original Message -----
From: "MARK BOSTICK" <thebigcollector_at_msn.com>
To: <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>; <bobe5531@comcast.net>
Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 5:03 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 1110 issues


> Hello Adam and list,
>
> Adam wrote "What you are doing is nothing short of
fraud."....."Nelson's
> pieces are paired to NWA 1068. NWA 1110 is also paired to NWA 1068,
as
> well. Pairing to a pairing is ridiculous, submit your own type
sample,
> claim the extra weight and get your own number."
>
> Fraud? For selling the same meteorite under the same name?
>
> Adam you should take this weekly act of yours on the road. I can
remember
a
> couple months ago when you complained that Farmer was using the name
Amgala,
> and if someone wants to look through the archives, they can find you
> complaining about people using multiple numbers on the same meteorite.
>
> I think you will find it hard to convince us that the same
> meteorite.....should have a different name or number from every
dealer,
and
> that to do underwise is "fraud". In my humble opinion, the same
> meteorite....is well, the same meteorite. And while I know it soulds a
> little funny, us calling the same meteorite, the same name, I really
do
> think it could work.
>
> Mark Bostick
> www.meteoritearticles.com
>
>
>


______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Thu 09 Sep 2004 11:15:54 AM PDT