[meteorite-list] Met List updating was Mbale TKW

From: Mendy Ouzillou <ouzillou_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:56:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1357865806.20600.YahooMailNeo_at_web126203.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>

That is one garbage pile I would gladly roll up my sleeves and dig through.

So here is a question, there is more research to be done, but already a good bit has been completed. We know of EL3, EL6, fine grained and coarse grained URE, Bencubinitte, EL3/4, EL4/5, and others I am sure I am overlooking. At what point does the MetBull get updated? Seems like valuable scientific information should be updated now and can be added to or modified later.


?
Mendy



----- Original Message -----
> From: Anne Black <impactika at aol.com>
> To: ouzillou at yahoo.com; mstreman53 at yahoo.com; zelimir.gabelica at uha.fr
> Cc: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com; jngrossman at gmail.com
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 4:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Met List updating was Mbale TKW
>
> Yes, but...........
>
> The study of Almahata Sitta is nowhere near finished.
> Prof. Bischoff at the University of Muenster is studying each and every
> fragment one at a time, that is how he discovered that one fragment was
> a Bencubbinite. But he has more fragments to go thru. No way to guess
> what else he might find!
> And Dr. Bunch called it a "Garbage Pile" of a meteorite, but a very
> nice garbage pile!? ;-)
>
>
> Anne M. Black
> www.IMPACTIKA.com
> IMPACTIKA at aol.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mendy Ouzillou <ouzillou at yahoo.com>
> To: MEM <mstreman53 at yahoo.com>; Prof. Zelimir Gabelic
> a Universit? de Haut
> e Alsace ENSCMu, <zelimir.gabelica at uha.fr>
> Cc: meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>; Jeff Grossman
> <jngrossman at gmail.com>
> Sent: Thu, Jan 10, 2013 11:42 am
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Met List updating? was Mbale TKW
>
>
> Elton,
>
> Timely question because this specific issue came to mind regarding
> Almahata
> Sitta.? AMH has many unique classifications depending on the stone that
> is/was
> being analyzed. I think the word used has been "rubble pile", but
> keeping track
> of the weights and unique classifications would be of great use.
>
>
>
> Mendy Ouzillou
>
>
>> ________________________________
>> From: MEM <mstreman53 at yahoo.com>
>> To: "Prof. Zelimir Gabelica Universit? de Haute Alsace ENSCMu,"
> <zelimir.gabelica at uha.fr>; Mendy Ouzillou <ouzillou at yahoo.com>
>> Cc: "meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com"
> <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>;
> Jeff Grossman <jngrossman at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:34 AM
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list]Met List updating??was Mbale TKW
>>
>>
>>
>> This is probably for Jeff Grossman but I am curious as to the process
> for
> updating details of a meteorite in the bulletin.? A TKW is one that is
> commonly
> encountered.? In the case where a follow on researcher reclassifies?
> the
> meteorite based on a different mineralogy in a second specimen after
> the first
> approval is published. Following that line of thought just how do we
> catalog
> duel lithology where the lithologies are from entirely different
> classes??
> Examples could be eucrite vs howardite or an EL 5 which we later find
> is mainly
> an and Enstatite achondrite in other studied samples. Do you go back
> and change
> the classification? Do you catalog both classifications?? Do you stick
> with the
> original?
>>
>>
>> Elton
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> FM
>>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Mbale TKW
>>>
>>> Hi Mendy,
>>>
>>> You are perfectly right, this is not an exact weight (200-250 kg is
> indeed
> just a range). I don't have that paper but this is part of the summary
> I got.
> But it is clear that this figure is just deriving from a (here
> "breakup") model.
>>>
>>> I am sorry for my misleading word "update". By this, I meant
> this
> should
> perhaps be added as a side remark to the writeup for Mbale, which I did
> in my
> own catalog, understanding that I maintained the official tkw and the
> number of
> pieces really collected (or at least reported).
>>>
>>> Sorry for the confusion. Excellent remark though.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Zelimir
>>>
>>
>>
>> ?
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Thu 10 Jan 2013 07:56:46 PM PST