[meteorite-list] Glorieta Hunt - "Diggers" episode Tonight NGC
From: Galactic Stone & Ironworks <meteoritemike_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:04:06 -0400 Message-ID: <CAKBPJW834DOSwr5=_Ds4jde=n93Ut-bFyhBqVT7v0G9yJBcRuw_at_mail.gmail.com> Discovery, Learning Channel, and A&E are wastelands of tripe now. I remember when TLC had "learning" on it. I remember when Discovery was about science. I remember when A&E had "arts" on it. Now it's Dog the Bounty Hunter and Pawn Stars. The networks are giving people what they apparently want - and that is a trainwreck of rednecks acting out contrived situations and scripted dialogue. Even the Smithsonian channel is getting a little dodgy. I see commercials on Smithsonian and Nat Geo for worthless "binoculars" that aren't worth 10 cents and they claim to be the best optical bargain on the planet - the choice of sportsmen around the world! (Order now and get a second set of useless pseudo-binoculars for just processing and handling!) - Any network with an ounce of scientific integrity (or any integrity) would refuse those advertisements - but that would mean turning away easy money from advertisers with deep pockets. The same goes for their print magazines - they should be ashamed of themselves for pushing worthless junk on their readers and viewers. I take everything I see on these channels with a block of salt. Well, these diggers and pickers have gotten more discussion time than they are worth. I vote for ending this thread and putting it into File 13. Best regards, MikeG -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone Twitter - http://twitter.com/GalacticStone Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone ------------------------------------------------------------- On 8/29/13, Michael Farmer <mike at meteoriteguy.com> wrote: > I guess I am just not in tune with the dreamers out there. It could have > been Napoleon's powder horn as well, but it wasn't and so pretending that it > might have been is dumb. Sorry to be so hard on your buddies, but this show > sucks, and it makes those of us who carry a metal detector look like > buffoons. Why am I not entitled to voice my opinion? I guess you only want > to hear about happy things, little puppies and "Hannibal Nectar's" lost > razor blade:) > Yes, Nat Geo channel sucks too, showing this crap. It makes me want to stop > donating money to the organization, clearly they have plenty to produce this > garbage. > > Michael Farmer > > Sent from my iPad > > On Aug 29, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Michael Mulgrew <mikestang at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Michael Farmer, why is posing a "could be" statement stupid? They say >> "could be" because those things "could be" true. They're probably >> not, but it's fun to hypothesize and use your imagination. You could >> be an asshole, but I don't know you other than what you write to this >> list. The only stupid thing I see here is grown men getting their >> panties in a bunch over an entertaining TV show. Write a letter to >> the producers and express your displeasure. It "could be" that you do >> not understand how television production works. Maybe you would enjoy >> some of NatGeo's other fine programming, such as Doomsday Castle, >> American Chainsaw, Are You Tougher Than a Boy Scout, Beast Hunter, >> Family Beef, or Chasing UFOs? >> >> And no, I do not think the BLM's meteorite memo had anything to do >> with what happened on a cable television show. Last I checked the >> Federal Government does not use television shows as a basis for >> official policy. It is much more likely that their policies were a >> result of real-world conflicts that happened on BLM land with real >> life meteorite hunters and recent falls that occurred just prior to >> the policy having been drafted. But wait, your conjecture is a "could >> be" statement, too. Such a vicious circle. >> >> Michael in so. Cal. >> >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Michael Farmer <mike at meteoriteguy.com> >> wrote: >>> It is just really stupid to say that "this could be Kitt Carson's powder >>> horn" or "Nectar Hannibal's razor-blade". This is entertainment for the >>> lowest end of the spectrum. It belongs on MTV after Real World, not on >>> National Geographic. I want the hour I wasted last night back! I would >>> have been better off looking for scorpions in my backyard than watching >>> this phony drivel. >>> I also love metal detecting, gold mining, and meteorite hunting, Ive done >>> them all, successfully. >>> These shows are so contrived, so fake, so over the top full of crap that >>> they are destroying these hobbies. Why do you think the BLM suddenly >>> focused on meteorites and shut down collecting unless you go through >>> years of paperwork? Could it be the idiotic prices quoted on certain >>> shows telling people they could make thousands on every fragment of rock >>> picked up? >>> Michael Farmer >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On Aug 29, 2013, at 9:09 AM, "Bob Loeffler" <bloeffler at peaktopeak.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I hate most of the reality TV shows that have been on for the last 20 >>>> years >>>> or so, but I do end up watching Diggers, Prospectors, Meteorite Men and >>>> Gold >>>> Rush every now and then because they are all related to my favorite >>>> hobbies >>>> (digging for mineral crystals, meteorites and cool old stuff). Yes, >>>> they >>>> are extremely over-hyped by the producers, but they are just >>>> entertainment. >>>> >>>> And I think Diggers is the least over-to-top when it comes to how much >>>> something can be worth. In one of the episodes this week, they found a >>>> really old button (possibly from the late 1700s) and they said it was >>>> worth >>>> around $15. If that was on Meteorite Men or Prospectors, they would've >>>> added two more zeros to the end of that number! I have seen 5 or 6 >>>> episodes >>>> of Diggers and they have never priced anything more than $100 that I >>>> can >>>> remember. Although I don't know what most historical items should be >>>> priced >>>> at, I've agreed with the pricing from an outsider's point of view. >>>> Would I >>>> pay $50 for a 150-year-old belt buckle in pretty good condition that >>>> might've been worn by Kit Carson or Billie the Kid? Sure! Would I pay >>>> $500? Heck no... unless there was really good evidence that one of them >>>> DID >>>> wear it. So I think a lot of the pricing on Diggers is not too far from >>>> a >>>> reasonable amount. A few items that they have found in past episodes >>>> had >>>> lower prices than I had expected, things that I thought were kind of >>>> cool >>>> looking, so I was actually PROUD of the producers for "doing the right >>>> thing" and not putting a hefty price tag on them. >>>> >>>> The guys on Diggers are really goofy, but that's the nature of the >>>> beast >>>> (i.e. TV shows). They are annoying, but seem like good guys out having >>>> fun, >>>> doing what they love to do. Just like Geoff and Steve on MM. >>>> Sometimes >>>> annoying, but we still love them on their show. And like Michael >>>> Mulgrew >>>> said, the Diggers guys don't keep what they find. I agree with others >>>> that >>>> they really should do more explaining on each episode (e.g. "we got >>>> permission to dig here, make sure you get permission to dig wherever >>>> you >>>> go") and dig their holes/flaps correctly to prevent erosion, dead >>>> grass, >>>> etc. I'm sure they fill in their holes, so I wouldn't worry about >>>> someone >>>> (or an animal) breaking their leg by stepping in a hole after these >>>> guys >>>> leave. >>>> >>>> I just went to the Diggers website >>>> (http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/diggers/) and saw this: >>>> >>>> "As the show's production archaeologist Kate Culpepper ensures that >>>> Diggers >>>> adheres to the strict standards of ethical metal detecting, and that >>>> the >>>> historical value of artifacts and local sites isn't compromised in any >>>> way." >>>> So there is probably more to all of this than what we see on the show. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Bob L. >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com >>>> [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of >>>> Michael >>>> Farmer >>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 9:05 PM >>>> To: Michael Mulgrew >>>> Cc: Meteorite List >>>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Glorieta Hunt - "Diggers" episode Tonight >>>> NGC >>>> >>>> Jesus Christ, this show is horrible, I cant even believe that the Nat >>>> Geo >>>> channel has sunk so low. >>>> Yeah, a crushed thimble worth $15! Good luck on getting a nickel out of >>>> anything these morons find. It is sad to see these reality shows sink >>>> so >>>> low. >>>> >>>> Michael Farmer >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPad >>>> >>>> On Aug 28, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Michael Mulgrew <mikestang at gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Adam and list, >>>>> >>>>> Far be it from me to defend anything on tv, but I do know (first hand, >>>>> from the "Diggers" themselves) that they do not keep anything they >>>>> find, it all goes to the land owners, and that their goofy terms have >>>>> roots in the DVDs these guys originally made years ago and are used >>>>> solely for entertainment purposes, i.e. another over-produced aspect >>>>> of a cable television show. You and all other treasure hunters know >>>>> that these terms are fake, but that's ok because those terms aren't >>>>> for you, they're for the general public at home who know nothing about >>>>> treasure hunting and get a kick out of two wack-ohs running around and >>>>> getting crazy when they find something. >>>>> >>>>> Any time anyone's passion/hobby is portrayed on a tv show, the "real >>>>> world" practitioners are going to be affronted; these are not the >>>>> target audiences for these types of shows. If I was the worlds >>>>> greatest nose picker and someone made a show about picking noses I'm >>>>> sure it would be portrayed all wrong and ruin nose picking for all of >>>>> us elite and dedicated Pickers. >>>>> >>>>> So enjoy these shows for what they are, entertainment; they are not >>>>> meant to be taken seriously. Mainstream network news >>>>> (ABC/NBC/FOX/CNN/etc.) is just as fake and staged as all of these >>>>> shows, and I view it in the same light. >>>>> >>>>> Michael in so. Cal. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Adam Hupe <raremeteorites at yahoo.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> Yep, Glorieta will be the next area permanently off limits. These >>>>>> guys >>>> on Diggers are an embarrassment to the treasure hunting community. >>>> Treasure >>>> hunting club members that I stay in touch with cringe every episode >>>> knowing >>>> that these guys violate the rules and are ruining it for everybody >>>> else. >>>> The Cascade Treasure Hunting Club reminds its members that these guys >>>> are >>>> just rogue entertainers and that they are not real treasure hunters who >>>> tend >>>> to keep their finds to themselves or only share them with other club >>>> members. >>>>>> >>>>>> Lets go find some "Nectar" , "Juice" and "Roundness", baby talk terms >>>> used on the show that no real treasure hunter would get caught dead >>>> using in >>>> the field! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Adam >>>>>> ______________________________________________ >>>>>> >>>>>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >>>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>>>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>>>> ______________________________________________ >>>>> >>>>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >>>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> No virus found in this message. >>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>>> Version: 2013.0.3392 / Virus Database: 3211/6615 - Release Date: >>>> 08/28/13 >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> >>>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >>>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>> ______________________________________________ >>> >>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > ______________________________________________ > > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >Received on Thu 29 Aug 2013 02:04:06 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |