[meteorite-list] Mifflin Update... and Real Mifflin Photos...

From: Greg Catterton <star_wars_collector_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 15:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <109002.5979.qm_at_web46411.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>

The slice Jim has is the non Mifflin stone.
Jim, sorry, I have tons of emails, just got to yours and sent you an email as you must have been posting this.
I am reclaiming the material and will be sending a sample soon to be tested to try to confirm when this fell and just what it is.

Greg Catterton
www.wanderingstarmeteorites.com
IMCA member 4682
On Ebay: http://stores.shop.ebay.com/wanderingstarmeteorites
On Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WanderingStarMeteorites


--- On Sun, 5/8/11, michael cottingham <mikewren at gilanet.com> wrote:

> From: michael cottingham <mikewren at gilanet.com>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Mifflin Update... and Real Mifflin Photos...
> To: Jimski47 at aol.com
> Cc: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Date: Sunday, May 8, 2011, 6:21 PM
> Hello,
>
> I think the one you mentioned...is really hard to tell.
> Catterton did a part trade/cash deal with me and some of the
> trade material was REAL Mifflin that I personally found,
> even though you purchased it from him it might be the real
> deal, at least on that piece. The time frame would have to
> be after July 10th, because he did not have my real Mifflin
> until after then.
>
> Best Wishes
>
> Michael
> On May 8, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Jimski47 at aol.com
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Michael and list,
> >
> > Not all of the Mifflin photo's on the Met. Bulletin
> (IMCA Encyclopedia of?
> > Meteorites) are of the real thing. I have three photos
> there. One is a?
> > slice from Joe's main mass, another is a complete
> individual that I? found
> > during my five day hunt and the fake is the slice that
> I purchased? from Greg
> > Catterton. I contacted Greg C this morning to get my
> refund and? have not
> > received a response. I'll remove the photo later. If
> you have one that? looks
> > like this, you've been duped.
> >
> > Best Wishes,
> > Jim K
> >
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 5/8/2011 3:47:13 P.M. Central?
> Daylight Time,
> > mikewren at gilanet.com
> writes:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Since Jason posted? his discovery, 2 more pieces
> of "fake" Mifflin have
> > been recovered. Taking into? account cut loss, I
> think I am almost certain that
> > I have recovered 95% of the? stone that I was
> duped into buying.? I will
> > not be 100% certain until all? of the pieces are
> returned to me.? Even though,
> > I have not been 100%? refunded for my purchase, I
> feel it is important to
> > refund people's money? immediately or as fast as
> possible and to get this
> > fake crap off the market and? into the trash
> can... or maybe into a lawyer's
> > hand!
> >
> > PLEASE NOTE:???If you have any doubt
> about a Mifflin specimen you obtained
> > from me ...PLEASE? send me a photo so I can
> confirm one way or the other.
> > Especially ,if it does? not look like anything in
> the Met Bulletin below. Even
> > if you did not get it? from me, but just want a
> second opinion... send me
> > the photo.
> >
> > Here is? also a link to photos of Real Mifflin.
> Everything posted in the
> > Meteoritical? Bulletin entry is indeed REAL?
> Mifflin.
> >
> > http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=52090
> >
> >
> > Best? Wishes
> >
> > Michael? Cottingham
> > ______________________________________________
> > Visit the? Archives at?
> > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> > Meteorite-list? mailing? list
> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >
>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Sun 08 May 2011 06:38:11 PM PDT