[meteorite-list] Mifflin Update... and Real Mifflin Photos...
From: michael cottingham <mikewren_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 16:21:50 -0600 Message-ID: <0E35E264-FDF4-4B8D-B6DF-FB81DB00F3A3_at_gilanet.com> Hello, I think the one you mentioned...is really hard to tell. Catterton did a part trade/cash deal with me and some of the trade material was REAL Mifflin that I personally found, even though you purchased it from him it might be the real deal, at least on that piece. The time frame would have to be after July 10th, because he did not have my real Mifflin until after then. Best Wishes Michael On May 8, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Jimski47 at aol.com wrote: > Hi Michael and list, > > Not all of the Mifflin photo's on the Met. Bulletin (IMCA Encyclopedia of > Meteorites) are of the real thing. I have three photos there. One is a > slice from Joe's main mass, another is a complete individual that I found > during my five day hunt and the fake is the slice that I purchased from Greg > Catterton. I contacted Greg C this morning to get my refund and have not > received a response. I'll remove the photo later. If you have one that looks > like this, you've been duped. > > Best Wishes, > Jim K > > > > In a message dated 5/8/2011 3:47:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > mikewren at gilanet.com writes: > Hello, > > Since Jason posted his discovery, 2 more pieces of "fake" Mifflin have > been recovered. Taking into account cut loss, I think I am almost certain that > I have recovered 95% of the stone that I was duped into buying. I will > not be 100% certain until all of the pieces are returned to me. Even though, > I have not been 100% refunded for my purchase, I feel it is important to > refund people's money immediately or as fast as possible and to get this > fake crap off the market and into the trash can... or maybe into a lawyer's > hand! > > PLEASE NOTE: If you have any doubt about a Mifflin specimen you obtained > from me ...PLEASE send me a photo so I can confirm one way or the other. > Especially ,if it does not look like anything in the Met Bulletin below. Even > if you did not get it from me, but just want a second opinion... send me > the photo. > > Here is also a link to photos of Real Mifflin. Everything posted in the > Meteoritical Bulletin entry is indeed REAL Mifflin. > > http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=52090 > > > Best Wishes > > Michael Cottingham > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > Received on Sun 08 May 2011 06:21:50 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |