[meteorite-list] Michael Cottingham's BATH FURNACE

From: michael cottingham <mikewren_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:19:56 -0700
Message-ID: <200802191322921.SM00956_at_yourfsyly0jtwn>

Hello,

My thoughts too! Piece came from an impeccable source, so really no doubt it
is Bath Furnace. My larger pieces show a lot of fragmental breccia and with
the case of many chondrites, if classified today, their classifications
might be different 30% of the time(a guess?) or at least more "defined" in
their classification.

Thanks and Best Wishes

Michael Cottingham

-----Original Message-----
From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of
bernd.pauli at paulinet.de
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 11:59 AM
To: Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
Subject: [meteorite-list] Michael Cottingham's BATH FURNACE

Hello All, ...

. and especially those who already own (Don Edwards, for example)
or have purchased pieces from M.C. My three Bath Furnace specimens
(2.56 + 0.38 + 0.37 grams) arrived today and after my first quick
look at them under the micoscope at 8x mag. I almost believe that
a reclassification of this historic L6 chondrite is overdue.

If this material is genuine (which I have to assume), it looks more like
an L4-5 or an L5 fragmental breccia. The 2.56-gram slice has way too
many chondrules to be a run-of-the mill, ordinary L6 chondrite.

One of the smaller specimens does look like an L6 chondrite though.
Hmmm, ... maybe an L4-6???

What about the others who have bought specimens from MC?
Any input would be appreciated!

Bernd

______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Tue 19 Feb 2008 03:19:56 PM PST