[meteorite-list] Tunsguska the movie

From: Michael L Blood <mlblood_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:56:34 -0800
Message-ID: <C3904132.1270A%mlblood_at_cox.net>

Hi Sterling and all,
        Sterling, you are right about my comment. Please accept my apology.
        Agreed: No GW thread!
        Sincerely, Michael
 

on 12/20/07 3:26 PM, Sterling K. Webb at sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net
wrote:

> Hi, Michael, List,
>
> Michael wrote:
>
>> If you want a lesson in denial, read the archives on the
>> HUGE number of list members regarding the denial of
>> Global Warming. And this is a list consisting of people
>> WAY above average in both intelligence and educational
>> Achievement.
>
> 1. PLEASE, nobody start a GW thread. I'm not trying
> to do that. No thread. I'm biting my tongue here, people.
>
> 2. To state that a scientific issue can no longer be evaluated,
> discussed, or even argued, to imply that individuals who do so
> are mentally defficient or uneducated, to attempt to invalidate
> any reasoned viewpoint that does not agree with your own, is:
> a) bad manners
> b) bad judgment
> c) bad science
> d) ideological compulsion (otherwise known as -- no,
> wait, I'm biting my tongue...)
>
> 3. The comment was gratuitious and totally unnecessary
> in a discussion of the 0.7499950384-mile diameter Barringer
> crater. Let's just settle it and call it three-quarters of mile...
>
>
> Sterling K. Webb
> (from the deck of my barge
> as I drift down De Nile...)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael L Blood" <mlblood at cox.net>
> To: "E.P. Grondine" <epgrondine at yahoo.com>; "Meteorite List"
> <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 2:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Tunsguska the movie
>
>
> on 12/20/07 10:12 AM, E.P. Grondine at epgrondine at yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> PS - Barringer crater is a mile across, not a
>> kilometer, as I wrote earlier. Thus, assuming neutrons
>> are released in impact, and that this results in
>> higher C14, then from the radio-calibration correction
>> charts Firestone cited, the mammoth peperrer impact
>> crater, should it still exist, should be less than a
>> mile across.
> My understanding is it is much closer to .8 mi in diameter.
> That is a very significant difference in area.
> Best wishes, Michael
> PS: If you want a lesson in denial, read the archives on the
> HUGE number of list members regarding the denial of
> Global Warming. And this is a list consisting of people
> WAY above average in both intelligence and educational
> Achievement.
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
 
Received on Thu 20 Dec 2007 06:56:34 PM PST