[meteorite-list] Elma Status?

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

From: Charles R. Viau <cviau_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:16:31 2004
Message-ID: <000e01c35d7b$a8ab6030$1800a8c0_at_chupa>

>If this is what the List members want. I will simply will not post
future >results obtained in the lab regarding this material, pretty
simple, no need >for you and Mike to get nasty

This is NOT what this list member wants. This is supposed to be a
free-format forum where people who share the same passion get to share
their experiences with peers. I have a major objection to being denied
information that I am interested in, just because some people feel it is
ok to show such disrespect to someone just because the subject does not
gel with their personal view of what is important. Think about that -
They only future information you will get is exactly what you want to
hear. Isn't that F($%!&$ scientific!

Charlyv

-----Original Message-----
From: meteorite-list-admin_at_meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-admin_at_meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Adam
Hupe
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:19 PM
To: Tom aka James Knudson
Cc: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

Hi Tom and List members,

I am only responding because a problem seems to be developing here.
Mike
Farmer claims scientists are wasting their time on this material and
that
this is a waste of bandwidth on the List. The scientists are the ones
who
dispatched us to bring this material to them. The University of
Washington
is studying this material own their own and we are simply assisting by
bringing material in. If you look at the archives I did not initiate
this
"Elma status" chain, I simply responded to a question. You propagated
this
long string by asking several questions which were posted to the list.
Since they were posted to the List I responded publicly. If this means
I am
wasting bandwidth you are just as guilty by posting questions to the
list.

If this is what the List members want. I will simply will not post
future
results obtained in the lab regarding this material, pretty simple, no
need
for you and Mike to get nasty.

All the best,

Adam

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom aka James Knudson" <knudson911_at_frontiernet.net>
To: "Michael Farmer" <farmerm_at_concentric.net>; "Adam Hupe"
<adamhupe_at_comcast.net>
Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

> Hello List, Mike wrote;
> ", I am simply offended by people wasting
> scientific time with nonsense, especially now when it can take years
to
get
> a simple classification."
>
> I have to agree with mike here. Adam and Greg said this was not a
meteorite
> in the beginning, and I think they would know! But, I for one, have
been
> chastised big time for posting OT things to the list. There was not a
fall
> in Elma and the things the people from Elma are claiming to meteorites
are
> not meteorites and in my opinion have no place on the list. I am
interested
> in the end result, but until then, I think we should save Art some
bandwidth
> on this subject.
>
> Thanks, Tom
> Peregrineflier <><
> The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Farmer <farmerm_at_concentric.net>
> To: Adam Hupe <adamhupe_at_comcast.net>
> Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
>
>
> > Ok Adam, tell us all, where did you get your science degree? Oh I
forgot,
> > you have none, so please stop playing scientist.
> > I don't have a closed mind, I am simply offended by people wasting
> > scientific time with nonsense, especially now when it can take years
to
> get
> > a simple classification.
> > Mike Farmer
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Adam Hupe" <adamhupe_at_comcast.net>
> > To: "Michael Farmer" <farmerm_at_concentric.net>
> > Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 1:40 AM
> > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
> >
> >
> > > Hey Mike and Dear List,
> > >
> > > Ex and current NASA scientist know the difference between tar and
glass.
> > > Maybe you should have an open mind because you would be blown away
by
> the
> > > lab results if you truly understood mineralogy. This is
definitely
not
> > tar,
> > > only somebody with a closed mind and no understanding of chemistry
would
> > > make such a statement, go back to school.
> > >
> > > Adam
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Michael Farmer" <farmerm_at_concentric.net>
> > > To: "Charles R. Viau" <cviau_at_beld.net>; "'Adam Hupe'"
> > > <adamhupe_at_comcast.net>; <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:14 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
> > >
> > >
> > > > Well, It CANNOT be a tekite, tektites are made by large impacts
> melting
> > > the
> > > > impacted rock. these were found in a telephone pole! My god,
every
> > > telephone
> > > > pole I have ever seen is covered in tar or whatever weird melted
black
> > > stuff
> > > > they use, sort of like tar on house roofs, which I believe that
the
> > Hupes
> > > > also "found" in the debris from my printer-smashing Park Forest.
HMMMM
> > > tiny
> > > > little melted tektites found on the floor under the smashed
shingles
> and
> > > > tarred roof, more little melted glass like "tektites" found in
and
> round
> > a
> > > > telephone pole at the site of a stupid hoax that got way more
> attention
> > > than
> > > > it should have. I see a curious pattern forming here. Maybe
there
> were
> > > some
> > > > "bugs" smashed into the tar so we have little "spidy" creatures
like
> the
> > > > Frass meteorite.
> > > > Charles. I have never heard of you, but I assure you that
I
> know
> > > just
> > > > a tad more than you might think, and I assure you that this is a
waste
> > of
> > > > scientific time.
> > > > It defies the most simple things that we know about meteorites,
thus
> > > making
> > > > it bogus.
> > > >
> > > > Mike Farmer
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Charles R. Viau" <cviau_at_beld.net>
> > > > To: "'Michael Farmer'" <farmerm_at_concentric.net>; "'Adam Hupe'"
> > > > <adamhupe_at_comcast.net>; <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Given the reputation of the people examining this stuff, how
busy
> they
> > > > > are, and the amount of time they are willing to spend on this
-
It's
> > not
> > > > > crap. It is probably more related to a tektite than anything
else
if
> > one
> > > > > were to summon up a simile , and how did pieces of this wind
up
> > embedded
> > > > > in a telephone pole? - I think the Hupe brothers , as well as
the
> > PhD's
> > > > > in those labs are doing their job because they believe there
is
> > > > > scientific merit in doing so, and no matter what the outcome,
they
> > need
> > > > > to know what it is because it passed through the filters that
would
> > have
> > > > > tossed 'crap' out 2 weeks ago. Perhaps, if you had some of
this
> stuff
> > > > > you might feel different.
> > > > >
> > > > > Charlyv
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: meteorite-list-admin_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > > > > [mailto:meteorite-list-admin_at_meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf
Of
> > Michael
> > > > > Farmer
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
> > > > > To: Adam Hupe; meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > > > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
> > > > >
> > > > > Give me a break people, this is retarded. Yep, YE HAA PA saw
that
> > there
> > > > > little glass chunks fall out of the sky and they burnded my
hands
> two
> > > > > weeks
> > > > > later!
> > > > > Why waste time on this crap.
> > > > > Mike Farmer
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Adam Hupe" <adamhupe_at_comcast.net>
> > > > > To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:26 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Tom,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No glass manufacturing process would use this kind of sand
because
> > of
> > > > > it
> > > > > > impurities and why would glass be spread into a shot-put pit
where
> > > > > kids
> > > > > > could get cut on the sharp edges? I am not going to
speculate
too
> > > > > much
> > > > > more
> > > > > > until we get more lab results. Two other labs have weighed
in
on
> > this
> > > > > > occurrence and it just keeps getting odder.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > All the best,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Adam
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Tom aka James Knudson" <knudson911_at_frontiernet.net>
> > > > > > To: "Adam Hupe" <adamhupe_at_comcast.net>;
> > > > > > <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:17 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello All, How about a glass manufacturing bi-product?
> > > > > > > Thanks, Tom
> > > > > > > Peregrineflier <><
> > > > > > > The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: Adam Hupe <adamhupe_at_comcast.net>
> > > > > > > To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:08 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Tom and List,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The problem with this material is that it does not
contain
any
> > > > > metal.
> > > > > > If
> > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > was in a reducing environment why isn't there any metal,
even
> at
> > > > > > > microprobe
> > > > > > > > levels? This almost certainly eliminates this material
coming
> > > > > from an
> > > > > > > > industrial process, at least none that I have ever heard
of.
> If
> > > > > it
> > > > > came
> > > > > > > > from a foundry why wasn't the sand melted in the center.
The
> > sand
> > > > > is
> > > > > > also
> > > > > > > > trapped in sealed vesicles, that look almost like
chondrules,
> > like
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > condensation product, which is extremely odd. It was
> extremely
> > > > > > difficult
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > make thin-sections of this stuff because of the
friability
of
> > the
> > > > > > material
> > > > > > > > trapped inside.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Will update as we get more results,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Adam
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > From: "Tom aka James Knudson"
<knudson911_at_frontiernet.net>
> > > > > > > > To: "mafer" <mafer_at_imagineopals.com>; "Adam Hupe"
> > > > > <adamhupe_at_comcast.net>
> > > > > > > > Cc: "meteor central"
<meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hello All, This Elma stuff sounds like a metal casting
> > > > > bi-product
> > > > > from
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > foundry. Is there a foundry in our around Elma?
> > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tom
> > > > > > > > > Peregrineflier <><
> > > > > > > > > The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
> > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > From: mafer <mafer_at_imagineopals.com>
> > > > > > > > > To: Adam Hupe <adamhupe_at_comcast.net>
> > > > > > > > > Cc: meteor central
<meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:30 PM
> > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > fulguritic? given a sighting of a smoking trail and
> > smoldering
> > > > > > pieces
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > "basaltic" glass with sand inside, sounds like some
> > > > > atmospheric
> > > > > > event
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > > From: Adam Hupe <adamhupe_at_comcast.net>
> > > > > > > > > > To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:22 PM
> > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Mike, Mike and List,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite,
so to
> > > > > speak.
> > > > > It
> > > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > > > > prove to be just as or more interesting to the
> scientific
> > > > > > community.
> > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > jury is still out on exactly what this material is
or
> how
> > it
> > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > created.
> > > > > > > > > > > The initial lab results created more questions
than
> > answers.
> > > > > As
> > > > > > has
> > > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > > reported this material consist of sand incased in
a
> > basaltic
> > > > > glass
> > > > > > > > > shell.
> > > > > > > > > > > The materials in the glass are not separated into
swirls
> > so
> > > > > what
> > > > > > > ever
> > > > > > > > > > > created these objects had a huge amount of energy
and
> the
> > > > > glass
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > quenched
> > > > > > > > > > > very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to
see
how
> > > > > these
> > > > > > might
> > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > been created. We should have more answers by next
week.
> > > > > This
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > looking
> > > > > > > > > > > more like an X-files episode than a meteor
sighting.
> For
> > > > > now,
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > keeping an open mind regarding this material.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > All the best,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Adam and Greg Hupe
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > > > From: "Michael Farmer" <farmerm_at_concentric.net>
> > > > > > > > > > > To: "Mike Groetz" <mpg444_at_yahoo.com>; "Meteorite
List"
> > > > > > > > > > > <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:35 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Mike, forget about this one, there is not a
chance
in
> > hell
> > > > > that
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > meteorite
> > > > > > > > > > > > was recovered there.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Mike Farmer
> > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > > > > > > From: "Mike Groetz" <mpg444_at_yahoo.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > To: "Meteorite List"
> > <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Everyone-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this all said and done with or is the
jury
> still
> > > > > > > > > > > > > out with any maybe's?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web
site
> design
> > > > > > software
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > > > > > > > > > >
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > > > > > > > > >
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > > > > > > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > > > > > > > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ______________________________________________
> > > > > > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > > > > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > > > > > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ______________________________________________
> > > > > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > > > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > > > > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >
>
>

______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Fri 08 Aug 2003 03:06:53 AM PDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Nick Gessler: "[meteorite-list] Meteorite Law"
Previous message: Michael L Blood: "[meteorite-list] Meteorite Collecting Ban"
In reply to: Adam Hupe: "[meteorite-list] Elma Status?"
Next in thread: M come Meteorite Meteorites: "[meteorite-list] Elma Status?"
Reply: M come Meteorite Meteorites: "[meteorite-list] Elma Status?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

StumbleUpon

del.icio.us

Yahoo MyWeb