[meteorite-list] Meteorite Law

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

From: Nick Gessler <gessler_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:16:31 2004
Message-ID: <5.1.1.5.2.20030808000831.02d8b960_at_mail.ucla.edu>

<html>
I wonder if Douglas Schmitt's "interviews" could in any stretch
of the term be considered "a scientific sample?" 
Does he even attempt a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the
"contributions to the field" by finders, collectors, dealers,
academics, scientists, etc? 
Byron Groves gives an encouraging interpretation of Meteorite Law on his
website: 
<a href="http://www.bgroveswon.com/meteoritelaw/meteorite_law.html" eudora="autourl">http://www.bgroveswon.com/meteoritelaw/meteorite_law.html</a> 
Byron's bottom line: 
Based on the skimpy facts, my conclusion would be that the finder
rightful on the land would have as much ownership of the find as could be
owned. 
Let's keep our community united in diversity! 
Nick</html>
Received on Fri 08 Aug 2003 03:13:59 AM PDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: mark ford: "[meteorite-list] Meteorite Collecting Ban"
Previous message: Charles R. Viau: "[meteorite-list] Elma Status?"
In reply to: Robert Verish: "[meteorite-list] Re: Meteorite Collecting Ban"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

StumbleUpon

del.icio.us

Yahoo MyWeb