[meteorite-list] Meteorite Collecting Ban
From: Michael L Blood <mlblood_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:16:31 2004 Message-ID: <BB588391.94AF%mlblood_at_cox.net> Well, Bobarino, You may be on the "Bad Boy Black List" but you extracted the ultimate revenge: LA 001 & 002 ! Way to go, Bobbo......... Michael on 8/7/03 10:03 PM, Robert Verish at bolidechaser_at_yahoo.com wrote: > Well Al, > > If what you say is true, then I may want to know the > name of this "snitch", too. No doubt, this "tipster" > informed on me, as well, when I wrote this post back > in 2001: > > ------------- Archived Message ---------------- > > [meteorite-list] NOT [OT] > Robert Verish bolidechaser_at_yahoo.com > Fri, 12 Oct 2001 17:20:32 -0700 (PDT) > > > Hello List, > > The recent thread about pending legislation to further > restrict fossil collecting may not be as much > Off-Topic as we would like it to be. But the less put > in print about this subject, the better. > > But what has been put in print (and is much more > On-Topic), is an abstract for a poster that was > presented at the recent meeting in Rome - the > 64th Annual Meteoritical Society Meeting (2001). > The author is not a meteoriticist, but a lawyer! > > Is anybody surprised that this law firm is from > Canada? > > This abstract is now published in: > > MAPS, Vol. 36, No. 9, Supplement, 2001 - A183 > > It still appears "on-line" at: > > <http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/metsoc2001/pdf/5150.pdf> > > LAW OF OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF METEORITES. > D. G. Schmitt, > McEwen, Schmitt & Co. Barristers and Solicitors, > 1615 ? 1055 W. Georgia St., > Vancouver, B.C., > Canada, > V6E3R5 > email: dgs_at_marinelawcanada.com > > Introduction: Increased public awareness and commerce > in meteorites raises questions about their ownership > and control. This paper reviews the law in several > countries, international law, and considers laws to > bring finds to the research community quickly and not > divert them to a black market. A survey was made of > scientists involved in meteorite acquisition in over > 20 countries, to determine how well various systems > work. > Ownership is determined by the law of the place of the > find. Legal regimes range from a free market, to > deemed > state ownership with no compensation to finders. A > free > market gives an incentive to searchers but allows > ownership by private collectors who do not curate > specimens scientifically. > > Confiscatory laws tempt searchers to conceal or sell > finds illegally, or misrepresent strewn field data. > Scientists expressed diverging views on an ideal > system. > > Historical Background: Meteorite ownership law is > non-uniform. English common law, from which the law in > former British colonies including the United States > evolved, provides that meteorites are the landowner?s > property; buried meteorites might be part of the > mineral rights. Find reporting is not mandatory. Most > Western European countries, and former colonies, have > civil codes providing that meteorites are owned by the > landowner. Traditional legal systems with unique rules > exist, such as the Islamic Sharia. In many countries > legislation aimed at preserving archeological > treasures > modifies earlier meteorite law. > > Federal nations may have different laws in each state. > Lawyers qualified in the find jurisdiction should be > consulted for ownership opinions. > > Selected Examples: > > Argentina. The Chaco Province constitution declares > meteorites provincial property, imposing a duty to > protect them. > > Australia. Some state legislation vests ownership in > state museums, prohibits find movement except delivery > to museums, and allows refunds of finder?s expenses. > > Canada. Meteorites are the property of the landowner > and can be sold. Under the Cultural Property Export > and > Import Act a Canadian find cannot be exported without > a > permit from a federal Board which may impose a > six-month delay of permanent export during which a > Canadian institution may purchase it for a ?fair? > price, failing which export is allowed. Temporary > export permits are granted forthwith. > > Denmark. Finds are state property, and must be > surrendered to a museum, which pays market value. > > India. Meteorites are deemed owned by the Geological > Survey of India, without compensation. > > Japan. The finder is the owner under the civil code. > Switzerland. Finds are owned by the state but the > finder is paid compensation not higher than the > object?s value. > > United States of America. A find is owned by the > land-owner. > A find on federal government property is owned by > the Department of the Interior but may be acquired by > the Smithsonian Institution. > > UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting > and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer > of Ownership of Cultural Property: This Convention, > ratified by over 90 states, provides for tracking and > retrieving from reciprocating states, cultural > property including meteorites. > > Ratifying states may create a permitting agency like > Canada?s. > > Antarctic Meteorites: The Antarctic Treaty > indefinitely > defers national territorial claims and encourages > cooperative scientific exploration. Article III (B) > states, ?scientific observations and results from > Antarctica shall be exchanged and made freely > available?. The Treaty does not deal with samples > exported. Meteorites are recovered only by > gov-ernment- > sponsored expeditions, and curated by NASA in the > United States, the National Institute of Polar > Research in Japan, and by EUROMET. Applications for > U.S. curated > samples are reviewed by the Meteorite Working Group. > Conclusions: Meteorite ownership law varies widely. > Generally survey respondents reported cooperation from > finders, to whom some compensation was paid whether > required or not; however there were incidents of > important meteorites, or find data, being lost to > science. The best system for each country depends on > the relationship between each government and its > citizens. Governments should be urged to enact > workable laws appropriate to their jurisdiction to (1) > encourage collection by providing reasonable > incentives > to finders, with mandatory find reporting, (2) create > efficient export permitting systems allowing exchange > of research samples, and (3) retrieve illegally > exported meteorites under the UNESCO Convention. > > Acknowledgments: All survey respondents particularly > A. > Bevan, B. Hofmann, H. Haack, and H. Plotkin; G. R. > Schmitt, Q.C. > _____________ End of Archived Message _______________ > > Too bad we don't have some kind of "Meteorite > Collectors Advisory Council" or some kind of > association that could lobby for our interests in this > political arena. > > On more Black-Lists than you would imagine, > BOb V. > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list SUPPORT OUR TROUPS: http://www.takebackthemedia.com/onearmy.html -- "Facts are stupid things." Ronald Reagan -- Worth Seeing: - Earth at night from satellite: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0011/earthlights_dmsp_big.jpg - Interactive Lady Liberty: http://doody36.home.attbi.com/liberty.htm - Earth - variety of choices: http://www.fourmilab.ch/earthview/vplanet.html -- Panoramic view of Meteor Crater: http://www.virtualguidebooks.com/Arizona/GrandCanyonRoute66/MeteorCrater/Met eorCraterRimL.html -- Cool Calendar & Clock: http://www.yugop.com/ver3/stuff/03/fla.html -- Michael Blood Meteorites & Didgeridoos for sale at: http://www.michaelbloodmeteorites.com/Received on Fri 08 Aug 2003 01:30:41 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |