[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Response to previous Farrell communications
At 03:11 PM 2/13/98 -0500, you wrote:
>OK, thanks Darryl,
>
>Just wondering If you were saying the Register article contained false
>allegations made by Yale and "U.S. officials" or you thought Ron deserved his
>day in the sun. It appears you believe Ron's version to be the "unsanitized"
>truth and that there is indeed a global conspiracy involving dealers,
>universities, museums, foreign governments and the U.S. Government to
>persecute Ron. Certainly wouldn't want to be in his shoes!
>
>--Gene
Hi-
Just returned from out-of-town. I would simply submit that a transcribed
interview, statement or any other direct testimony is desirable.
I do not subscribe to Ron's claims of a global conspiracy. I also have no
reason to believe that the New Haven piece contains false allegations--but
given the interpretation of events on the part of the writer, I prefer to
form an opinion which includes a consideration of Ron's statement.
As I think we've all covered the subject adequately, I'm not going to speak
of this matter any further unless there are new developments--and I hope
that none come to pass.
Best-
Darryl
References: