[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: In Mr. Farrell's own words...
OK, thanks Darryl,
Just wondering If you were saying the Register article contained false
allegations made by Yale and "U.S. officials" or you thought Ron deserved his
day in the sun. It appears you believe Ron's version to be the "unsanitized"
truth and that there is indeed a global conspiracy involving dealers,
universities, museums, foreign governments and the U.S. Government to
persecute Ron. Certainly wouldn't want to be in his shoes!
--Gene
Darryl Pitt wrote:
>
> Gene--
>
> As for your question, it was my belief that it would be more productive for
> subscribers (and others) to read the unsanitized version of the events
> right out of the horse's mouth, so to speak, than read write-ups
> contaminated by a reporter's agenda and/or failings.
>
> Warm regards
> Darryl
>
> >I'm sure many of us understood your original post and/or saw the press release
> >you attached. I am confused, however, about what you are trying to suggest.
> >Are you saying that the New Haven Register article is biased in presentation
> >or contains incorrect information? Might not Ron's press release also be
> >biased or one-sided?
> >
> >I have no problem with giving everyone a chance to present their own side of
> >the story, but I found the most telling aspect of Ron's version to be the
> >people and organizations that distanced themselves from the situation. It is
> >unlike Senators and the US State Department to walk away from falsely accused
> >US citizens in a foreign country.
> >
> >Gene
Follow-Ups:
References: