[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: In Mr. Farrell's own words...

Gene--

As for your question, it was my belief that it would be more productive for
subscribers (and others) to read the unsanitized version of the events
right out of the horse's mouth, so to speak, than read write-ups
contaminated by a reporter's agenda and/or failings.

Warm regards
Darryl


>I'm sure many of us understood your original post and/or saw the press release
>you attached. I am confused, however, about what you are trying to suggest.
>Are you saying that the New Haven Register article is biased in presentation
>or contains incorrect information? Might not Ron's press release also be
>biased or one-sided?
>
>I have no problem with giving everyone a chance to present their own side of
>the story, but I found the most telling aspect of Ron's version to be the
>people and organizations that distanced themselves from the situation. It is
>unlike Senators and the US State Department to walk away from falsely accused
>US citizens in a foreign country.
>
>Gene
Follow-Ups: