[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Flight 800 Meteor report
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: Re: Flight 800 Meteor report
- From: CMcdon0923@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 23:08:09 EST
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Reply-To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 23:09:30 -0500 (EST)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"g0Ax8C.A.7hD.46l60"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
In a message dated 98-02-17 21:02:39 EST, you write:
<< I sort of find it hard to believe that it wouldn't be more often. When you
think that a number of cars have been struck while on the ground
(Peekskill,Benold as examples) and also houses (although I would think there
would be much more area in houses than aircraft) an even a mailbox has been
struck. >>
Personally I think it would be LESS. Add up the total number of cars and/or
houses, and figure out their respective total surface areas. Now do the same
for planes. Add to that the fact that planes are a 'moving target' and I
personally think the odds become astronomical. Besides, planes routinely
survive lightening strikes, punctures due to engine failures, (some)
structural failures, etc. A meteorite (meteoroid?) at the 'normal' altitude of
flight would usually be of such a small size (due to ablation) that the
chances of it 'taking out' an aircraft seem just too remote to me.
I have no facts to back this up...this is just my opinion.
Follow-Ups: