[meteorite-list] Clarification

From: John Lutzon <jl_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 21:22:56 -0500
Message-ID: <7D8261DA8A0B427CA946281E366DE3DF_at_Home>

Even the Idiot that I am -- cannot fathom this continuing (can't find the words)
oh yeah--Bull--shi-- !
To further clarify your clarification-- it is very clear to everyone that this ongoing
thread is clearly DONE.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Hupe via Meteorite-list" <>
To: "metlist" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2017 9:06 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Clarification

In an attempt to be as clear as possible, I must clarify a statement I
posted to the list on November 5th:

The statement below which was made during the debate that escalated into
arguments, was not clearly articulated and could be taken as a single
event, when in actuality, it was two:

The complaint against you, on the other hand, about self-pairing a Black
Beauty stone, which was never paid for according to the seller, resulted
in a different outcome.


The part that reads "which was never paid for according to the seller"
was a qualifying statement in regards to the stone and not part of the
original self-pairing complaint to the IMCA. This information was
conveyed to me at a later date.

The IMCA doesn't consider complaints about non-paying parties that
default on agreements.


Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
Received on Tue 07 Nov 2017 09:22:56 PM PST

Help support this free mailing list:

Yahoo MyWeb