[meteorite-list] Clarification

From: Adam Hupe <raremeteorites_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:06:59 -0800
Message-ID: <6ffa5ebc-f757-e32d-2e95-89622d98972f_at_centurylink.net>

In an attempt to be as clear as possible, I must clarify a statement I
posted to the list on November 5th:

The statement below which was made during the debate that escalated into
arguments, was not clearly articulated and could be taken as a single
event, when in actuality, it was two:

The complaint against you, on the other hand, about self-pairing a Black
Beauty stone, which was never paid for according to the seller, resulted
in a different outcome.


The part that reads "which was never paid for according to the seller"
was a qualifying statement in regards to the stone and not part of the
original self-pairing complaint to the IMCA. This information was
conveyed to me at a later date.

The IMCA doesn't consider complaints about non-paying parties that
default on agreements.

Received on Tue 07 Nov 2017 09:06:59 PM PST

Help support this free mailing list:

Yahoo MyWeb