[meteorite-list] Novato update

From: Michael Mulgrew <mikestang_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 19:47:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMseTy3bY-78H9BkwwfZpx+C=5p8qN=Qc3PEpmKZ=w6vE_zmyg_at_mail.gmail.com>

Jason (and list),

My "comment" was actually a question, and that question was with
regards to the fact than any work done on an unapproved meteorite
cannot be published by LPSC or MetSoc, so why not get it approved
first, then commence with the tests, paper writings, and publications?
 What merit do the test results have if they cannot be published? It
was an honest question born of ignorance of the process.

Michael in so. Cal.

>On May 1, 2013 11:50 AM, "Jason Utas" <meteoritekid at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 6) Michael Mulgrew's recent comment makes no sense to me. Every
> meteorite must be studied to some extent prior to publication, or it
> could not be published.
Received on Wed 01 May 2013 10:47:53 PM PDT