[meteorite-list] A Bunch of Irregular Stones I Found (+How I Think They May Have Originated)

From: Anne Black <impactika_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:19:45 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <8CFF56ADFF416EC-978-4E1E2_at_webmail-d236.sysops.aol.com>

Yes, very much terrestrial. Most likely slag.

You may want to study this site very carefully:
http://meteorites.wustl.edu/more_info_nonlunar.htm
Particularly all the pictures of meteorwrongs.


Anne M. Black
www.IMPACTIKA.com
IMPACTIKA at aol.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Ensor <graham.ensor at gmail.com>
To: Peter Richards <pedrichards at gmail.com>
Cc: meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 5:14 pm
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] A Bunch of Irregular Stones I Found (+How
I Think They May Have Originated)


Hi Peter

I'm afraid all the pictures I can get to work from your links are all
typical of terrestrial industrial slag and not meteorites.

Graham

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Peter Richards
<pedrichards at gmail.com> wrote:
> -This stone seems to have a feature which suggests a (modified) layer
> of the stone was once in a malleable state, and, also, under pressure,
> appearing as if it has been folded back (on the left side of the
> stone, note what was revealed is duller in texture, and more grey than
> the glassy outer surface)::
>
http://www.flickr.com/photos/67498324 at N08/8580370971/in/set-72157633060844363/
> -This has a surface with a "bubbly" appearance, suggesting liquid
> material collected before concretizing:
>
http://www.flickr.com/photos/67498324 at N08/8580364375/in/set-72157633060844363/
> -Here is a shot of the collected masses from a vicinity about the size
> of a very small house:
>
http://www.flickr.com/photos/67498324 at N08/8580374795/in/set-72157633060844363/lightbox/
> The location where these were collected, incidentally, is due north of
> the location where many of the heavier Park Forest fragments were
> found, and well within the constraints, of course, of known strewn
> field dispersion, which has led me to believe these may have been a
> part of the same fall, and undetected for a number of reasons,
> including the commonality of gunshots in the area (especially true ten
> years ago if I understand correctly), and rather poor air quality
> which might have led people living nearby to remain oblivious of any
> new arrivals such as these would have been, according to my theory.
> Some are very dense, and others are less so. I understood that there
> were two main types of material recovered in Park Forest, and wonder
> whether any additional variety prospectively found here might
> represent the remains from an asteroidal impact, or something of that
> sort.
>
> Peter Richards
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

  
Received on Fri 22 Mar 2013 07:19:45 PM PDT