[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day
From: John Lutzon <jl_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:12:16 -0500 Message-ID: <2FEBAD278BC1459A802288B4E060D0D9_at_Home> With all due respect, 1. Fall 2. Find 3. Observed fall 4. Unobserved fall 5. Observed find 6. Unobserved find God bless all that we have to enjoy & study [before GPS] and the camel jockey's and the everyday hunters! Refer to #6. My vote is for #'s 1&2---Fall--Find John L ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mendy Ouzillou" <ouzillou at yahoo.com> To: "Anne Black" <impactika at aol.com>; <hall at meteorhall.com>; <mike at meteoriteguy.com> Cc: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>; <valparint at aol.com> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 8:33 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day Logic versus accepted terminology versus practicality. I like the conciseness of Fall versus Find - It's easier to fit and write on a specimen card. :-) An unobserved fall may never become a find. Mendy Ouzillou >________________________________ > From: Anne Black <impactika at aol.com> >To: hall at meteorhall.com; mike at meteoriteguy.com >Cc: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com; valparint at aol.com >Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 5:27 PM >Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day > >Every single meteorite ever found on Earth is necessarily the result of >a fall, they are not native to Earth. The only difference is that some >falls are seen, witnessed, and some, the vast majoriry, are not. > >So calling them Observed or Unobserved falls is logical. That is what >happened to all of them. >That is simple reality. > > >Anne M. Black >www.IMPACTIKA.com >IMPACTIKA at aol.com > > >-----Original Message----- >tFrom: hall <hall at meteorhall.com> >To: Michael Farmer <mike at meteoriteguy.com> >Cc: meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>; valparint ><valparint at aol.com> >Sent: Fri, Jan 4, 2013 6:13 pm >Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day > > > An "unobserved fall" is two words to describe the one word that has >been used for a century, "Find". The one word "Find" is good enough for >the Catalogue of Meteorites, it was good enough for Harvey Nininger, >and it is what I shall always use. Keep it concise. >Regards, Fred Hall > > > >That would make sense for say New Orleans, where a stone went through a >> house and no one in their right mind would suggest that it did not >fall at >> that time say between 8 am and 4 pm when there was no hole in the >house, >> yet it was not seen to fall. >> An old rock found in a field does not suggest anything about fall >date. So >> it is a find, something never really argued against until now? >> It has crust which can suggest it is not thousands of years old, most >of >> our Springwater meteorites have black and blue crust but nevertheless >it >> is a find. >> Michael Farmer >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jan 4, 2013, at 10:28 AM, <valparint at aol.com> wrote: >> >>> An "unobserved fall" is, well, a fall that was not observed, in >>> contradistinction to a fall that was observed. The terminology of the >>> Meteoritical Bulletin Database is "Observed fall: no". >>> >>> The information being conveyed is NOT that the meteorite fell but >that >>> the fall was not observed. >>> >>> In general, the questions about falling and finding are: >>> >>> 1) was the fall observed? >>> 2) if so, when was it observed? >>> 3) if not, is there any guesstimate of when it fell? >>> 4) regardless of weather it was observed or not, when was it actually >>> found? >>> >>> Paul Swartz >>> MPOD webmaster >>> >>>> What is an "unobserved fall"? Every meteorite fell at some point. I >>>> have thousands of unobserved falls in my collection. >>>> Michael Farmer >>>> >> ______________________________________________ >> >> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> > > >______________________________________________ > >Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >Meteorite-list mailing list >Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > >______________________________________________ > >Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >Meteorite-list mailing list >Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Fri 04 Jan 2013 09:12:16 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |