[meteorite-list] Novato update

From: Adam Hupe <raremeteorites_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1367351117.78964.YahooMailNeo_at_web122002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>

Jim Wrote,

We have a procedure and it seems only one person is not in compliance with thatprocedure..

I agree completely.? If one dealer can hold up a classification because he/she is too cheap to deposit their share or thinks they are above the rules, the world is better off without them!

Adam


----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Wooddell <jimwooddell at gmail.com>
To: Alan Rubin <aerubin at ucla.edu>
Cc: Meteorite-list Meteoritecentral <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>; "Matson, Robert D." <ROBERT.D.MATSON at saic.com>; Robert Verish <bolidechaser at yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Novato update

In regards to what Alan stated, this makes perfect sense to me and I
agree with that of which the committee has decided.? We have a
procedure and it seems only one person is not in compliance with that
procedure....in regards to classification and submittal to the NomCom.
No matter what the excuse is.? If the type spec amount (20 grams in
this case) is not for the purpose of science, then what's it
for...hoarding?

Is it going to kill anyone to give the classifying institution 20
grams?? Alan, if I had it, I give UCLA the whole darn thing and be
proud to do it.
I don't know....this just sounds messed up to me.

Jim Wooddell
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Tue 30 Apr 2013 03:45:17 PM PDT