[meteorite-list] SUTTER\'S MILL in MetBull

From: bill kies <parkforestmet_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 20:04:23 -0500
Message-ID: <SNT102-W65B665FF1BEA1D859E2758A2030_at_phx.gbl>

Considering the history I think Sutter's Mill is appropriate. Great PR blah blah blah. Maybe the name of the area should be changed to Carbonaceous whatever in honor of the meteorite? I don't care what it's called but I do hope some new intriguing science comes from it, although I doubt that will be the case.



----------------------------------------
> From: contact at briencook.com
> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 17:19:00 -0700
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] SUTTER\'S MILL in MetBull
>
> Let's say a significant main mass was found closer to Folsom Lake, would that change the name? Or is it based on the number known finds which has been in the Lotus/Coloma vicinity? Does the Meteoritical Society ever change the name after one has been established?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Unlimited Disk, Data Transfer, PHP/MySQL Domain Hosting
> http://www.doteasy.com
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Tue 22 May 2012 09:04:23 PM PDT