[meteorite-list] RSVP re Valera - documentation?
From: Michael Blood <mlblood_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:53:53 -0800 Message-ID: <CAEFD031.1FFD5%mlblood_at_cox.net> Hi Darryl, Thanks for the added info. Can you tell us if the material "out there" is from the actual Hammer stone that killed the cow - or is some of it so and the rest >From additional "rocks" of the fall? This would be valuable to know. Thanks, Michael On 11/20/11 11:03 PM, "Met. Darryl Pitt" <darryl at dof3.com> wrote: > > > VALERA REVISITED > > Hi, > > While not among my favorite stories, as you'll soon discover---I have no doubt > whatsoever Valera killed a cow. In brief, there was far more data collected > than the affidavit (which was one person's mere summary of events). > > Here's the story: > > Shepherded by Marty Zinn---the impresario of the Tucson Mineral and Fossil > Shows---Valera was first offered at the Macovich Auction 11 or 12 Tucson's > ago. Professor Ignacio Ferrin---a Venezuelan astronomer...and quite the > gentleman....acquired the meteorite after word of its existence wound its way > to him. Marty heard from Professor Ferrin who directed him to me, and he > consigned Valera to our auction. > > For those who are unaware, the clavicle of an otherwise healthy cow was > shattered and odd stones---only much later determined to be meteoritic---were > found near the carcass. The sonic phenomena associated with a meteorite fall > were experienced. Two large fragments from one mass were recovered (~35 and > 7.5 kg), and left outside, one of which was used as a doorstop over a period > of years---I imagine the lighter of the two. A third smaller specimen which I > vaguely recall as being pretty much complete had been brought inside and was > quite fresh. The specimens in circulation come from the larger fragments. > > Professor Ferrin gathered far more information other than his procurement of > the affidavit. He has long been exasperated by the ongoing questioning of > Valera's "killer" provenance by the meteorite collecting community, and has > gone on-record addressing this topic more than once. > > There are two important points worth mentioning here---both of which are > rather ironic. > > 1. It's important to recall that Ferrin was informed that the farm owner on > whose property the meteorite fell, physician Argimiro Gonzalez, didn't think > anything at all of this event. Dr. Gonzalez was well aware that rocks fell > out of the sky, and so it seemed entirely reasonable to him that such impacts > would occasionally result in fatalities. Without the rocks ever having been > analyzed, Gonzalez, and later his family, considered the rocks as > extraterrestrial curiosities---a conclusion which resulted from a dead animal > which had been pulverized by blunt force trauma whose instrument rested > nearby. It was the simplest explanation and somewhat a different tack than > would be taken by the meteorite community: simply expressed, Gonzalez > concluded as a result of a death that what he had must be a meteorite. It was > many years later that Ferrin heard the story, confirmed Gonzalez's hypothesis > and facilitated Valera's classification. > > 2. Every few years I have to admit to having undermined Valera's exceptional > provenance, and here's how: > > The larger of the two massess did not sell at our auction (it was a big rock > and pricey---while extremely inexpensive on a per/gram basis) and Ferrin > suddenly found himself in an unexpected financial bind. He did not have > particularly high expectations for how much it should sell---but he absolutely > expected it would sell, and now he was stuck---and he didn't want to take 40+ > kg of rocks back to Venezuela. I felt badly as I was confident it would sell, > and informed Ferrin of the same prior to his decision to bring Valera to > Arizona. So I decided I would purchase it---but by doing so I now put myself > in a huge financial pinch. So what did I do? The most foolish thing I've > ever done in meteorites: while I don't recall the precise numbers, I sold a > portion of the rock to another dealer for about my cost...perhaps a dollar a > gram, as I recall, and then we both sold Valera super-cheaply. > Percentage-wise we made a nice return, but the fact is that by having offered > it so ine > xpensively, a perceived valuation was created for a meteorite that should be > selling today for easily $250+/g. > > If you have a specimen of Valera---treasure it. If you don't have one, you > might consider getting some from somewhere as the price has been rapidly > escalating of late. This past June at a Heritage Auction, a 309 gram specimen > sold for $5,975 or about $20/g. I'm informed that small specimens today > typically sell for $25/gram and more---and as you know, getting from $2.50/g > to $25/g is the hard part. > > I'll never forget when I was on the exhibit floor at a Bonhams sale a couple > of years back and someone declared, "I don't think Valera killed a cow---it's > selling for MUCH too little for having done so." That was such a funny notion > to me...how MY screw-up fueled an inaccurate impression. (I did not mention > my role to the fellow ;-) > > > All the best / Darryl > > > > > On Nov 20, 2011, at 12:51 AM, MexicoDoug wrote: > >> Dear List; >> >> I have a question about the cow killing incident. >> >> The meteorite fell in 1972. I understand from rumors that it is absolutely a >> confirmed cow killer. But the document doesn't read as an absolute fact, but >> rather circumstantial evidence (which as a meteorite collector appreciating >> the size of the mass I want to believe quite strong). >> >> The affidavit was signed in 2001, after the Doctor on whose property the >> meteorite landed had died. >> >> Yet when I heard this, it was explained to me that a doctor had pronounced >> the cow dead and there was injury visible on the cow caused by the falling >> mass (a 50 kg stone). I always thought that a Doctor actually swore to the >> wound on the cow and was convinced it was caused by the stone, since a doctor >> would be expected to have a good idea of what such a wound would look like. >> >> This thread just prompted me to me read the affidavit. It doesn't say >> anything about wounds on the cow. >> >> The affidavit was by the Doctor's visitor, and specifically does not even >> mention that the doctor made any opinion about the meteorite killing the cow. >> But does mention the doctor had owned the property and passed away >> subsequently. No one from the Doctor's family, just the visitor, Juan >> Dionicio, commenting 30 years later says it "appeared" (presumably him since >> he doesn't mention the doctor) the cow was killed by the rock when he saw it >> the next day. It does not mention any injuries or wounds to the cow at all. >> Just "it appeared the cow had been killed by the rock" and also that "the cow >> then eaten". >> >> Yet I heard at the time I bought this that the cow had sustained a mortal >> injury the injury I recall being described at one point. Why this is not in >> the document? ... has me thinking something must be missing? >> >> Is this the only document that discusses the claim of a cow being killed? >> Because it seems to me people have much more information than is contained in >> the affidavit. (But I've run up enough against rumors to believe that it's >> easily possible for the rumors to just be taller tales down the line). Was >> there a newspaper article in the 70's or anything predating this, or were >> there any other witnesses besides Juan Dionicio, the mysterious guest who it >> sounds spent several nights on the good doctor's ranch? I'd really like to >> know. >> >> Kindest wishes >> Doug >> >> ______________________________________________ >> Visit the Archives at >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list -- Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.Received on Mon 21 Nov 2011 12:53:53 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |