[meteorite-list] Bigfoot and the "Nakhla Dog" - what do they havein common?
From: al mitt <almitt_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 20:56:43 -0400 Message-ID: <CB3BC84CEBB440B48027F2B1F4699A83_at_StarmanPC> Mike, You posted twice on a subject that doesn't belong on this list. I am sure there are people on the list who are biting their tongues right now. Everyone has a right to believe what they want to and that includes you but when you put such posts on a list dedicated to meteorites you are just asking for someone to defend their believes by your post. I am sure there are other people here who have a different belief system than you. I didn't post anything to the list the first time, but time to call you out on this. Keep your anit-religious believes off this forum and just talk meteorites and meteorite related topics so we don't get into a can of worms here. Thank you. --AL Mitterling ----- Original Message ----- From: "Galactic Stone & Ironworks" <meteoritemike at gmail.com> To: "Becky and Kirk" <bandk at chorus.net> Cc: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 7:49 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Bigfoot and the "Nakhla Dog" - what do they havein common? > All of the remaining bigfoots were raptured on saturday - they will > never be found now. > > Also, sales of all bigfoot-related material is hereby suspended until > further notice. ;) > > Best regards, > > MikeG > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Galactic Stone & Ironworks - Meteorites & Amber (Michael Gilmer) > > Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com > Facebook - > http://www.facebook.com/pages/Galactic-Stone-Ironworks/218849894809686 > News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516 > Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone > EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > On 5/22/11, Becky and Kirk <bandk at chorus.net> wrote: >> I indeed have heard stories about Semi-drivers who HAVE occasionally hit >> a >> Sasquatch in the Pacific Northwest. >> >> The one particular tale I heard 2nd-hand was from man who talked to a >> driver >> who said he hit & killed one in Colorado many years ago. He said he was >> detained for a bit by a special group of police, while another group >> cleaned >> his truck of all evidence of his "fatal encounter" with Bigfoot. >> >> Who knows?? >> >> Kirk.....:-) >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Kevin Kichinka" <marsrox at gmail.com> >> To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> >> Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 6:33 PM >> Subject: [meteorite-list] Bigfoot and the "Nakhla Dog" - what do they >> havein >> common? >> >> >>> Team Meteorite: >>> >>> While I am pursuing other projects now and can't take the time to >>> again pursue/review or explain my peer-reviewed and published "thesis" >>> (see David Weir "Meteorite Studies" and Nakhla) that absolves the >>> Nakhla meteorite of "dogocide", one argument that was made in support >>> of this crime against canines was that I "couldn't prove it DIDN'T >>> HAPPEN." >>> >>> >>> Never mind that no one recovered a bloody meteorite or a dead dog >>> allegedly killed on the wrong day at the wrong place. >>> >>> >>> Science and logic are brothers in arms. My brief, college-time >>> exposure to "debate" (as a competition), taught me that if one argued >>> this double negative, "by rule" you lost the debate. Something about >>> being logical... >>> >>> >>> Just for fun, I bring this up as I read on Yahoo about the world's >>> "Top Ten unexplained things". Here's a quote from the article, please >>> pay special attention to the last sentence: >>> >>> >>> "For decades, large, hairy, manlike beasts called Bigfoot have >>> occasionally been reported by eyewitnesses across America. Despite the >>> thousands of Bigfoot that must exist for a breeding population, not a >>> single body has been found. Not one has been killed by a hunter, >>> struck dead by a speeding car, or even died of natural causes. In the >>> absence of hard evidence like teeth or bones, support comes down to >>> eyewitness sightings and ambiguous photos and films. Since it is >>> logically impossible to prove a universal negative, science will never >>> be able to prove that creatures like Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster >>> do not exist, and it is possible that these mysterious beasts lurk far >>> from prying eyes." >>> >>> >>> Very, very far indeed. >>> >>> >>> Long live the Nakhla Dog. >>> >>> >>> Thanks to all who sent me birthday greetings this week! >>> >>> >>> Kevin Kichinka >>> Tambor de Alajuela, Costa Rica >>> www.theartofcollectingmeteorites.com >>> www.LaQ-CostaRica.com >>> ______________________________________________ >>> Visit the Archives at >>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> >> ______________________________________________ >> Visit the Archives at >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > Received on Sun 22 May 2011 08:56:43 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |