[meteorite-list] Gebel Kamil

From: Jason Utas <meteoritekid_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:23:00 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTini1vhYL016uhgiAsx_E_FvC64FExNHoXVjWV9K_at_mail.gmail.com>

Carl,
You don't seem to understand what I'm saying.

1) The Egyptian government has made no claims regarding meteorite
ownership. The questionable claims were made by a few Egyptian
professors. No one with official governmental standing has said
anything.

2) Egypt has no laws in place (currently) that address the ownership
of meteorites. Well, none published. They tend to be good with such
things, and I can only assume that owning an Egyptian meteorite is
legal since it has historically never been an issue, and the
government has yet to make any sort of statement about it.

-- You seem to be suggesting that Egypt may have such laws. I'm not
sure where you got the idea, but even after I discounted it, you're
still pushing it, so I'm not sure what to say.

3) I'd like to point out that the US does have such laws pertaining to
meteorites. They suggest that any and all meteorites found on public
land belong to the US government.

Carl - you asked, "if the Gov . of Egypt owns it you cannot export it.
Isn't it that simple?"

4) In light of that fact that the US owns all meteorites found on
public land, by the logic of your statement, it should be illegal to
export (or own) any meteorite found on public land in the US. After
all, if all meteorites found on public land belong to the US
government, then, surely, one cannot legally export them.

So, to answer your original question, no. Based on all available
information, it is not illegal to export meteorites from Egypt,
because the country has no laws that restrict the ownership or export
of meteorites. Just some noisy professors who complain when it
happens.

These sorts of issues are typically not "that simple." If you want to
view things simplistically, I suggest you start asking people to turn
over all meteorites found on US public land to the public institution
nearest them.

Jason


On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:54 PM, <cdtucson at cox.net> wrote:
> Jason,
> Now you lost me?
> I was talking about Egyptian material. Specifically Gebel Kamil.
> My query had nothing to do with anything American ?at all.
> So, I say again. If it is illegal to own things there. It goes without saying it is also illegal to export it.
> This has been said to be the case with all things from Egypt. They are illegal to export.
> Period.
> Therefore, All meteorites taken or rather trafficked from Egypt must be illegal at least by Egyptian standards.
>
> I do know of a similar situation in Mexico. Their pre-Columbian art and anything else that has been nationalized by the government ?Belongs to the government and is therefore illegal to export.
> But, that does not mean it is illegal to import into the USA.
> The question them becomes; how do you feel about ownership once the material reaches USA soil?
> It is legally here by US standards but, it is at the same time ?illegally here by Mexican standards.
> This is so much recognized that timing becomes a real factor. If for example you brought the material to the USA prior to the Mexican law being enacted then generally it is accepted as legal here. However, I do know that the ?ICE agency does seize material brought to the USA soil if it was brought after such laws took effect in their respective countries.
> How this pertains to Gebel kamil seems obvious.
> This material is trafficked and therefore illegal by our own ICE agency. Maybe?
> There was a case in Tucson at the 2008 Gem show where American ICE agents actually seized an entire inventory from a dealer that illegally imported 4 tons of rare fossils from Argentina. So, as a matter of fact. ICE does get involved and the outcome of that case was that all of the seized material was returned to Argentina.
> This obviously had NOTHING to do with any cultural anything. It was just stuff they did not want to be taken from them. That's all.
> So, again. this does mean that Gebel Kamil may not be legal here?
> I don't know if it is or not.
> I am asking how the meteorite community feels about this sort of thing???
> Carl
> --
> Carl or Debbie Esparza
> Meteoritemax
>
>
> ---- Jason Utas <meteoritekid at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello Carl,
>> If we were talking about private ownership, I'd have to agree with
>> you. ?In this case, there are two things that argue for my
>> perspective.
>>
>> The first is that we in the US (as well as our government) don't seem
>> to mind at all when meteorites found on public land (e.g. Holbrook,
>> Franconia, Gold Basin, most dry-lake finds, and many other meteorites)
>> are retained in private hands and/or shipped out of the country. ?Do
>> some scientists in the US seem to be angered by this commercial aspect
>> of distribution and ownership? ?Yes. ?Is it against the law? ?Doesn't
>> seem like it. ?You note an interesting problem, though, that I'll deal
>> with below. ?As I noted in my last email, the government has tried to
>> reclaim only a single meteorite ever found on public land by
>> litigation, and have appeared wholly uninterested in most, if not all
>> other meteorites found on public land.
>>
>> The second is that the situation in Egypt seems to be analogous more
>> than superficially. ?The people trying to prevent the export of
>> meteorites from Egypt weren't/aren't government officials -- they're
>> professors, unaffiliated with the government. ?If you read the text of
>> Law 117, you would know that it specifically excludes meteorites,
>> since they're not of human genesis and have not been altered by people
>> in any way (well, Gebel Kamil appears to have not been touched by
>> prehistoric people, though I know that some other meteorites have had
>> cultural significance in the past). ?In other words, there are no
>> Egyptian export laws pertaining to meteorites, and the only people
>> saying that their export is illegal don't have the right to enforce
>> laws, never mind the fact that they seem to be making up new ones.
>>
>> Getting back to what you said -- you seem to be suggesting that every
>> meteorite found on public land in the US belongs to the government and
>> should not be:
>> 1) exported
>> 2) retained in private hands
>> 3) sold on an open market
>> - and should be turned over to the appropriate officials upon discovery.
>>
>> I don't think I need to say too much on here about that sort of
>> perspective. ?The moment you start telling people they're going to
>> have to turn over every last piece of Franconia, Glorietta Mountain,
>> and _____ Dry Lake xxxx to the government is the moment you start
>> getting...nasty emails, to say the least.
>>
>> I see it as the picking of a wildflower growing in someone else's
>> field. ?Does it belong to them? ?Yes. ?Do they care? ?No. ?Will you
>> get arrested for taking it? ?Don't be ridiculous. ?If they ask for its
>> return, though, I think you might be obliged to turn it over. I hope
>> that never happens...
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jason
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:23 PM, ?<cdtucson at cox.net> wrote:
>> > Jason,
>> > you said;
>> >
>> > "While this claim may be correct in the sense that objects on the
>> > public land of any country belong to the federal or state government
>> > with jurisdiction over the given land, if there are no export laws
>> > pertaining to a given resource, it is not illegal to export it. "
>> >
>> > Isn't this a circular argument?
>> >
>> > I mean isn't ?it irrelevant whether it is legal to export or not legal to export if it does not belong to you in the first place?
>> >
>> > Again, if the Gov . of Egypt owns it you cannot export it.
>> >
>> > Isn't it that simple?
>> >
>> > Which means it is in fact illegal to export.
>> >
>> > This has been discussed with regard to other minerals and fossils and it was stated that they do not belong to the finder either and therefore they are not yours to take.
>> > Just asking?
>> > thanks.
>> > Carl
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Carl or Debbie Esparza
>> > Meteoritemax
>> >
>> >
>> > ---- Jason Utas <meteoritekid at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hello Richard, Greg, All,
>> >>
>> >> To date an estimated 2-3 tonnes of shrapnel fragments have been
>> >> recovered, ranging in weight from a few grams to 35 kilograms. ?One
>> >> regmaglypted individual was found, weighing 83kg. ?It was discovered
>> >> and retained by the scientific expedition that first explored the
>> >> crater, so all that will be available for the likes of us are pieces
>> >> of shrapnel produced by the violent destruction of the main mass when
>> >> it produced the crater.
>> >>
>> >> some have asserted that it is illegal to export meteorites from Egypt
>> >> without approval from the state. ?I looked into the issue, and, as
>> >> best I can tell, this is entirely untrue. ?It seems as though the
>> >> academics involved in the discovery and exploration of the crater
>> >> decided to attempt to apply the Egyptian antiquities law that refers
>> >> specifically to man-made/cultural artifacts - to meteorites. ?In light
>> >> of that fact, I believe that all of the specimens exported legal, at
>> >> least until Egypt passes a law that acutally prohibits the export of
>> >> minerals specimens and/or meteorites.
>> >>
>> >> See here: http://www.cprinst.org/cultural-heritage-legislation-in-egypt
>> >>
>> >> Since there are no clear laws pertaining to meteorites, the real
>> >> question is whether or not a meteorite can be said to have "cultural
>> >> value."
>> >> If we break this idea down, the real question we need to ask pertains
>> >> to the definition of what can be termed "cultural."
>> >>
>> >> To my kowledge, at least in Egypt, 'law 117' has never been applied to
>> >> objects that were not human artifacts. ?(Never.)
>> >> The scientists working on the meteorite claimed that export permits
>> >> were required for meteorites because, "Everything which is found in
>> >> the Egyptian soil is property of the government." ?(Tarek Hussein,
>> >> former president of Egypt's Academy of Scientific Research and
>> >> Technology)
>> >>
>> >> http://www.sott.net/articles/show/213262-Deep-impact-market-the-race-to-acquire-meteorites
>> >>
>> >> While this claim may be correct in the sense that objects on the
>> >> public land of any country belong to the federal or state government
>> >> with jurisdiction over the given land, if there are no export laws
>> >> pertaining to a given resource, it is not illegal to export it.
>> >>
>> >> For a perfect example, note that all meteorites found on public and
>> >> BLM land in the US technically belong to the US government. ?Since
>> >> there are no US laws pertaining to the export of US meteorites, and
>> >> the government does not enforce their ownership of any of these
>> >> meteorites (with one historic exception), it is generally viewed as
>> >> legal to export meteorites from the US -- even those found on public
>> >> land.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Jason
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Greg Catterton
>> >> <star_wars_collector at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> > Prices are interesting with the meteorite. I do know that most of the material on the market is "stolen" and should not be sold. Egypt does not allow the export of meteorites and last I read, only about 2kg was approved for export.
>> >> > Its a nice meteorite, but should be considered illegal just like Berduc and others that come from countries with harsh export laws.
>> >> >
>> >> > Greg Catterton
>> >> > www.wanderingstarmeteorites.com
>> >> > IMCA member 4682
>> >> > On Ebay: http://stores.shop.ebay.com/wanderingstarmeteorites
>> >> > On Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WanderingStarMeteorites
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --- On Fri, 3/11/11, Richard Montgomery <rickmont at earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> From: Richard Montgomery <rickmont at earthlink.net>
>> >> >> Subject: [meteorite-list] Gebel Kamil
>> >> >> To: "'Meteorite-list List'" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
>> >> >> Date: Friday, March 11, 2011, 9:13 PM
>> >> >> Hello List.? Taking a breath for
>> >> >> a minute following the disaster in Japan, for welcome
>> >> >> relief? (yet God bless them please).... I'll ask about
>> >> >> this since I've been wondering for a while since the crater
>> >> >> was announced:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Do we yet have an estimated TKW of Gebel Kamil?? Also,
>> >> >> those first images of the couple (I've only seen two) of
>> >> >> complete regmaglypted individuals are somewhere unknown to
>> >> >> me, but wow!!? Which reflects on my next query...what
>> >> >> other 'individual-shrapnel' occurance events to we know of?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm fortunate to own a few nice sand-blasted pieces, as
>> >> >> many of us are.? The auction prices seem low to me.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Just curious, and wondering.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Richard Montgomery
>> >> >> ______________________________________________
>> >> >> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> >> >> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> >> >> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> >> >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ______________________________________________
>> >> > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> >> > Meteorite-list mailing list
>> >> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> >> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> >> >
>> >> ______________________________________________
>> >> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> >> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> >> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> >
>> ______________________________________________
>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Sun 13 Mar 2011 12:23:00 AM PST