[meteorite-list] Moon Dust
From: cdtucson at cox.net <cdtucson_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:50:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20110626125013.JHZLY.993720.imail_at_fed1rmwml29> Blaine Reed had an actual shuttle tile in his room at the Gem show. I don't recall the price. This was a real actual tile with numbers on it indicating where it went on the shuttle not just the material used to make real tiles as indicated on this web site. Blaine's was significantly more expensive because it was real but, I don't think it was flown in space. I was able to hold it. It weighs almost nothing. It feels like you are holding chalk, NOT ceramic tile. Carl Meteoritemax . -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote". ---- "John.L.Cabassi" <John at Cabassi.net> wrote: > http://www.thespaceshop.com/shuttilin.html > > -----Original Message----- > From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com > [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of > Michael Gilmer > Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 8:20 AM > To: MexicoDoug > Cc: Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Moon Dust > > > Hi Doug and List, > > Doug - it is great to see you posting again. I have missed your > insights. :) > > They are selling heat tiles from the shuttles at KSC? I didn't know > that, and I want one! > > I've been meaning to acquire some more space-related items - aerogel, > heat shield tiles, etc. > > Do they have a website where I can order the tiles, or do I need to > visit the gift shop in person? > > Best regards, > > MikeG > > PS - is there somewhere online to buy the Russian tiles also? > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > Galactic Stone & Ironworks - Meteorites & Amber (Michael Gilmer) > > Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com > Facebook - http://tinyurl.com/42h79my > News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516 > Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone > EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > > On 6/25/11, MexicoDoug <mexicodoug at aim.com> wrote: > > JG wrote to MG: > > "What law are you talking about?" > > > > Ditto! A fact-supported discussion would be so much nicer. > > > > It is my understanding that when Apollo lost its funding, oodles of > > relics entered the private domain and there wasn't much ado about it - > > > rather, a tacit acceptance and a party atmosphere pervaded in the wake > > > of Moonphoria and non had any scientific value at the time. Where are > > the retroactive vigorous sting operations hunting down these national > > treasures? I am sure the same "laws", whatever they might be, cover > > them. > > > > Post-facto contrived rules are a violation which seems to date to the > > Magna Carta and any remotely civilized society. All material loaned or > > > provided in exchange for analyses to be done which is covered by > > modern agreements (as Jeff alludes to) has a clear paper trail, but > > there are the nonsensical cases like tape on the Hasselblad magazines > > demonstrate how ludicrous things can become for reasons foreign to > > science and domestic to collectors willingness to pay. I take my place > > > behind the line of those who have already pointed this out. > > > > Moon specimens that were incidental and innocuous gifts of > > questionable or no value at the time seem to have taken a special > > place. But, there are other exceptions as well. As I peruse the aisles > > > of the gift shop at KSC I am tempted to buy a Space Shuttle heat tile. > > > Yet NASA has allegedly gone on record saying that it will not dispose > > of them by sale to the public (reason: we could be liable for > > unintended harm they might cause). Rumor has it that the Soviet Buran > > tiles are more interesting to collect and Russia has no such hang ups > > over them, so I'll hold out for one of them. If I had an American one > > it would not be satisfying in present company. I couldn't freely share > > > it with my international friends without risking being thrown in jail > > for providing sensitive military secrets to other nations... at least > > that is the rumor on how it was for a long time ... > > > > There is a clear demonstration of double standard and a willingness to > > > invent retroactive laws, which should be prohibited constitutionally, > > but the American system separates the judicial and that makes > > legislation from the bench a convenient option in cases like this. How > > > frustrating for Mr. Rosen, the guy who bought the gifted moon rock > > from a Honduran official for a large sum of money. The government > > simply snatched it from him and it was not because the Hondurans filed > > > a claim. If he had been compensated for his recovery of the specimen > > it would be different in my view. But the way it went down, there is > > reason to be wary of the court's freeloading and arbitrary mindset in > > these cases. It is quite removed from science and boils down to > > politics and setting cruel and unusual precedents at the expense of > > citizens for prior shoddy control practices. Mr. Rosen, the owner at > > the time of the Moon rock was never charged with any criminal activity > > - they just took the rock plaque and left him to brood. If they could > > have charged him I sort of think they would have given the zest to > > make examples out of people. But they got what they wanted - a > > precedent of no-ownership when before there was none to my knowledge. > > > > I would point out that this nonsensical legal gymnastic that seems to > > have developed ought to be applied to each and every scientist in the > > United States that is on any payroll or grant for a project who > > supposedly buys specimens in his free time. How different is such > > piggybacking from the microgram residues on a piece of tape out of a > > camera? How did Dr. King amass that huge personal collection on many > > field trips to places such as, aw, forget it. Not worth going into, it > > > would be more counterproductive than good to go there. > > > > Best wishes > > Doug > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jeff Grossman <jngrossman at gmail.com> > > To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > > Sent: Sat, Jun 25, 2011 8:34 pm > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Moon Dust > > > > > > What law are you talking about? > > > > On 6/25/2011 7:55 PM, Michael Gilmer wrote: > >> Hi Jeff and List, > >> > >> What strikes me here is that NASA has 842 pounds of lunar material > > and > >> they are apparently bent out shape over a few milligrams of dust > >> clinging to a piece of scotch tape. It's absolutely silly and it > >> speaks of skewed priorities. > >> > >> It was mentioned to me in private email by a respected list member > >> that the NASA samples in question were not addressed by the law until > > >> 1972. If that is true, then it seems to me that any sample removed > >> legally prior to that date would be "grand-fathered in" as legal. > >> > >> A relevant example would be trinitite. Trinitite removed before the > >> law specifically addressed it is legal. However, going to the site > >> now and removing trinitite is illegal. Another example would be > >> Canyon Diablo iron meteorites - those CD meteorites removed before > > the > >> "prohibition" are legal. Those removed today are illegal because one > >> must trespass to get them. The devil is in the details - how does one > > >> distinguish a legal Diablo meteorite from an illegal one? And how > >> would one determine a legal piece of dusty tape from an illegal one? > >> > >> ATTENTION GOVERNMENT - STOP PISSING AWAY OUR TAX MONEY CHASING AFTER > >> DUSTY TAPE! Instead, here are some suggestions for using our tax > >> money - build homes for the homeless, feed the hungry, offer medical > >> care to the sick, create jobs for the unemployed, fund the sciences, > >> or any number of things that are more important than dusty tape. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> MikeG > >> > > > > ______________________________________________ > > Visit the Archives at > > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > > Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > > ______________________________________________ > > Visit the Archives at > > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > > Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-listReceived on Sun 26 Jun 2011 12:50:13 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |