[meteorite-list] Meteorites 101-Bolide
From: Martin Altmann <altmann_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:43:34 +0100 Message-ID: <005c01cbb5d7$33addee0$9b099ca0$_at_de> Hi, I understood bolide sofar & always simply as a bright meteor up to a fireball. And can't remember, whether I read it ever in a different use than that (despite racing cars). Meanwhile I was reading Pliny (AD 23-79), and Pliny says he has the term "bolide" from Hipparchus (190-120 BC). For looking up Aristotle (384-322 BC) I was too lazy, couldn't find a latin translation on web and Greek I can't. Should be some terms in the 1st book of his meteora or meteorologica, where he writes about meteors&thunderbolts. Best! Martin Pliny, Natural History 2.25 (Bostock translation) CHAP. 25.?EXAMPLES FROM HISTORY OF CELESTIAL PRODIGIES; FACES, LAMPADES, AND BOLIDES. The faces shine brilliantly, but they are never seen excepting when they are falling one of these darted across the heavens, in the sight of all the people, at noon-day, when Germanicus C?sar was exhibiting a show of gladiators. There are two kinds of them; those which are called lampades and those which are called BOLIDES, one of which latter was seen during the troubles at Mutina. They differ from each other in this respect, that the faces produce a long train of light, the fore-part only being on fire; while the bolides, being entirely in a state of combustion, leave a still longer track behind them. -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Mark Bowling Gesendet: Sonntag, 16. Januar 2011 18:11 An: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorites 101-Bolide Hi?all, I have understood from my study that a bolide refers to a meteor that breaks up - not requiring the detection of an?audible report because, if observed from a distance, the sound may not be heard.??It is not?a bright meteor or fireball or large impactor, but simply a meteor that breaks up.? Right or wrong, that's the way I've been using the term when I report seeing one on the list.? Has anybody else been using it that way?? I've been lucky to have seen several dozen over the years (often colorful),?but?none up close like Elton (yet!). I would agree that the IAU should come up with a definition because the term?has come to mean too many things and?its use is?not going to go away any time soon.? In fact with the current explosion of public interest (no pun intended), more people are going to find the term and grab onto it. See you all soon! Mark B. Vail, AZ? Received on Sun 16 Jan 2011 06:43:34 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |