[meteorite-list] Conception Junction

From: cdtucson at cox.net <cdtucson_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 14:58:50 -0400
Message-ID: <20110826145850.FXTGC.1704397.imail_at_fed1rmwml34>

Seems to me Intercourse Pennsylvania might be at least remotely related?
Haha








  

 

---- Michael Mulgrew <mikestang at gmail.com> wrote:
> Bernd and List,
>
> I was thinking much the same thing, except for the statement by UCLA's
> Dr. John Wasson given in the write-up: "?there is no main-group
> pallasite that is closely related to Conception Junction. Conception
> Junction is unique."
>
> Best,
> Michael in so. Cal.
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Bernd V. Pauli
> <bernd.pauli at paulinet.de> wrote:
> > MichaelG. wrote:
> >
> > "In all seriousness, it is an attractive pallasite.
> > ?At first glance, it has a passing resemblance
> > ?to Brenham."
> >
> > In all seriousness: not only at first glance does it look
> > like Brenham. It does look suspiciously like Brenham.
> >
> > Maybe it is a transported Brenham mass!
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Bernd
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Fri 26 Aug 2011 02:58:50 PM PDT