[meteorite-list] Conception Junction

From: Michael Mulgrew <mikestang_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:12:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMseTy2S4vn8ogqOCoafk=zZfqh6hzPoRfkRnnk=eanrzhoQFg_at_mail.gmail.com>

Bernd and List,

I was thinking much the same thing, except for the statement by UCLA's
Dr. John Wasson given in the write-up: "?there is no main-group
pallasite that is closely related to Conception Junction. Conception
Junction is unique."

Best,
Michael in so. Cal.

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Bernd V. Pauli
<bernd.pauli at paulinet.de> wrote:
> MichaelG. wrote:
>
> "In all seriousness, it is an attractive pallasite.
> ?At first glance, it has a passing resemblance
> ?to Brenham."
>
> In all seriousness: not only at first glance does it look
> like Brenham. It does look suspiciously like Brenham.
>
> Maybe it is a transported Brenham mass!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bernd
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Fri 26 Aug 2011 02:12:05 PM PDT