[meteorite-list] Which came first the chicken or the egg?

From: Shawn Alan <photophlow_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <773683.57491.qm_at_web35404.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Hello Frank and Listers,

Why I asked this question was because a couple weeks ago I sent out some emails on a project I am working on and someone had suggested that I should have ALHA81005 with the project I am doing because it was the first Lunar meteorite found. Thats some big new for the meteorite/science world. I got to looking around and saw that the date was 1981 or 1982 when the lunar was discovered and I had also noticed on the Meteoritical Bulletin Database that Calcalong Creek was discovered 1960. I had also read other sources that stated that the Calcalong Creek was found after 1960 but before 1990 by an Aborigine meteorite hunter in the Millbillillie strewnfield. Science likes to be 100% right so to say that the ALHA81005 was the first discovered lunar meteorite has some doubt in my mind because of the project I am doing. Yes I can agree that the ALHA81005 is the first classified meteorite, however to say that it was the first lunar to be found has some little doubts
 because of what had be going on in Austrial from 1960 to 1990 with the collecting of the Millbillillie meteorites. I would like to see or hear what Robert Haag can recall from that day when he found that specail meteorite. Hes the first source and could help enlighten what he can recall from the day he found the first lunar meteorite out side of Anartica and could also be the first found lunar as well. Hope he reads this and can put some light on to this fasinating discovery.

?
Shawn Alan
IMCA 1633
eBaystore
http://shop.ebay.com/photophlow/m.html









--- On Tue, 4/26/11, Frank Cressy <fcressy at prodigy.net> wrote:

> From: Frank Cressy <fcressy at prodigy.net>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Which came first the chicken or the egg?
> To: "Shawn Alan" <photophlow at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "meteoritelist" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2011, 8:33 PM
> Shawn,
>
> I think you've misinterpreted your source a bit.? It says
> that Calcalong Creek
> was found?AFTER 1960.? As I remember it Millbillillie
> fell in 1960, but no
> meteorites from?that fall?were found until the early
> 1970s.? Many stones were
> found in the 70s and 80s and are still being found today.?
> There is no data as
> far as I know as to when Calcalong Creek was actually
> picked up.? Haag found
> Calcalong Creek in a box of Millbillillie stones stones he
> purchased?in1990 or
> 1991 and he recognized it as "different" then.? Unless you
> can say exactly when
> Calcalong Creek was picked up I think you have to go with
> ALHA81005 as the first
> lunar.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Frank
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Shawn Alan <photophlow at yahoo.com>
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Sent: Tue, April 26, 2011 5:59:05 PM
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Which came first the chicken or
> the egg?
>
> Hello Listers
>
> The question is which came first the chicken or the eggs?
> Well lets get back to
> the but I have a better one, which came first Calcalong
> Creek Lunar?or ALHA81005
> Lunar ? Sources and research states that ALHA81005 was the
> first Lunar
> meteorite. But how can that be? Calcalong Creek meteorite
> was recovered by an
> Aborigine meteorite hunter in the Millbillillie strewnfield
> in 1960 ish and
> discovered by Robert Haag in 1990 ish. Now wouldn't the
> statement make more
> since if it read like this.......
>
> Calcalong Creek meteorite was the first discovered Lunar
> meteorite and ALHA81005
> was the first classified Lunar meteorite?
>
>
> These sources state this........
>
> ALHA81005
>
> Whats special about this one?
>
> It's the first rock found on Earth recognized to be a
> meteorite from the Moon.
> Compositionally, mineralogically, and texturally it is
> unlike any other lunar
> meteorite.
>
> http://meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/stones/alha81005.htm
>
>
> Calcalong Creek
>
> Whats special about this one?
>
> It was the first lunar meteorite to have been found outside
> of Antarctica.
> It is the only lunar meteorite to have been found in
> Australia.
>
> http://meteorites.wustl.edu/lunar/stones/calcalong.htm
>
>
> I would say the links are partly right but feel that
> Calcalong Creek should also
> say that it was the first found Lunar meteorite.
>
>
> So now what came first Calcalong Creek or ALHA81005 or can
> we say the chicken?
>
>
> Shawn Alan
> IMCA 1633
> eBaystore
> http://shop.ebay.com/photophlow/m.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
Received on Wed 27 Apr 2011 01:10:29 AM PDT