[meteorite-list] NWA 6292 (BRA) IS paired to NWA 5400 !
From: Martin Altmann <altmann_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:17:24 +0200 Message-ID: <002e01cb5f28$a36f9300$ea4eb900$_at_de> But, Shawn, Count, all.. with NWA you get material, which you couldn't afford, if you'd have to buy it in form of historics, material, where not sufficient quantities for all, collectors&scientists, are available among the historics, you get NEW material and sometimes material not to be found among historics and you get it at an all-time-in-history-rock-bottom-low-price. (See my boringly lengthy posting from yesterday on the IMCA-list) And I don't know, always this volatileness... I mean for most collectors, meteorites are more than only an episode of two or three years, NWA we have for only 10 years now, all in all I don't have the impression that a price decline of NWAs happened, to me it seems rather, that the recent years they're getting - some slowly, some faster - more expensive. And if you think on the somewhat longer run, mid-term, I think, then it won't carry weight, whether today a NWA costs a couple of dollars more or less. Btw. meteorites are much more than curios or collectibles, they are objects of current cutting-edge research. Other than with fine art, antiques, coins, books, baseball cards ect. that field isn't so concludingly closed in that respect. And really..., it is certainly not the business of the research institutes and universities, to serve as certifiers and consultants for the valuation of meteorites as commercial collectibles. They do research and science. And that is one point, which makes meteorite collecting so fascinating, that you can participate to a certain degree in the red-hot space research! Best! Martin -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Shawn Alan Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. September 2010 17:46 An: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com Betreff: [meteorite-list] NWA 6292 (BRA) IS paired to NWA 5400 ! ? Adam wrote: ? **************************************************************************** ******* ? This issue is not unique to NWA meteorites. The same thing could be said for Antarctic or other desert finds. Yes, Antarctica is a desert. The same issue applies to falls. How much Allende is really out there? Nobody knows for sure, the same can be said for Murchison. You can make the same claim for just about any fall. ? **************************************************************************** ******* ? Adam the difference between NWAs and all the other falls is that NWA nobody knows where the strewn fields are. As for the rest, there is data on strewn fields and correct documentation that is used to asses the fall or find. ? But with a NWA I find that people say that only buy my NWA because its the real deal and the pairs are inferior. The problem with that is with NWAs are collected and through out the months or year the same meteorite gets recycled back to dealers and in a since every NWA stone has to be classified cause of the collection process. ? Good example is NWA 2999, I think this meteorite has 2 other pairings if not more and think how many pairs it will have in a few years from now? And another good example is NWA 5400 which could have a few pairs, which are very likely. ? Now when people bank of there NWA as being rare cause of low TKW it seems that it this could be misleading cause of the circumstances that NWAs present to science and they way they are collected. ? ? Shawn Alan IMCA 1633 eBaystore http://shop.ebay.com/photophlow/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_from=&_ipg=&_trksid=p 4340 ? ? ? Received on Tue 28 Sep 2010 12:17:24 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |