[meteorite-list] '100 percent' chance for life on newlyfoundplanet?

From: Stuart McDaniel <actionshooting_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:49:59 -0400
Message-ID: <1A6561E233B6483B82A4AE8EF92DD6FC_at_StuartMcDaniel>

OK, That makes sense. So we just leave it up to the Russians to bring down
our sats??

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Steve Dunklee" <steve.dunklee at yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 11:38 AM
To: <actionshooting at carolina.rr.com>; <sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net>;
<stanleygregr at hotmail.com>; <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] '100 percent' chance for life on
newlyfoundplanet?

> I don't remember the FCC code but the rules only allow transmissions of
> radio signals on specific wavelengths and powers. You would have to apply
> for a licence specifically for extra terestrial transmissions. And I dont
> think they would grant one. If you accidently sent a 2k watt signal at the
> same frequency as one of the iridium satalites you would burn out its
> electronics and be in some deep shit lol. Cheers Steve
>
> On Wed Oct 6th, 2010 8:00 PM EDT Stuart McDaniel wrote:
>
>>Why is it illegal??
>>
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------
>>From: "Sterling K. Webb" <sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net>
>>Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 5:43 PM
>>To: "Thunder Stone" <stanleygregr at hotmail.com>;
>><meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>; <steve.dunklee at yahoo.com>
>>Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] '100 percent' chance for life on
>>newlyfoundplanet?
>>
>>> The message has already been sent! Social Networking has
>>> reached out to the stars.
>>>
>>> In October 2008, members of the networking website Bebo
>>> beamed A Message From Earth, a high-power transmission at
>>> Gliese 581, using the RT-70 radio telescope belonging to the
>>> National Space Agency of Ukraine. This transmission is due
>>> to arrive in the Gliese 581 system's vicinity by the year 2029;
>>> the earliest possible arrival for a response, should there be
>>> one, would be in 2049.
>>>
>>> Transmission of such a message from U.S. soil is a criminal
>>> offense, I believe. Or at least, frowned upon.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sterling K. Webb
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thunder Stone"
>>> <stanleygregr at hotmail.com>
>>> To: <sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net>;
>>> <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>; <steve.dunklee at yahoo.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:22 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] '100 percent' chance for life on newly
>>> foundplanet?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok then - how about a Radio Transmission. I would assume we are doing
>>> this. What would we send?
>>>
>>> We gotta do something!
>>>
>>> Greg S.
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>> From: sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net
>>>> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com; stanleygregr at hotmail.com;
>>>> steve.dunklee at yahoo.com
>>>> CC: clp at alumni.caltech.edu
>>>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] '100 percent' chance for life on newly
>>>> foundplanet?
>>>> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 15:37:43 -0500
>>>>
>>>> To The List Travel Club:
>>>>
>>>> A 0.008c probe could be built tomorrow (got cash?). It
>>>> would take about 2600 years to reach the Gliese 581
>>>> system and maneuver through it and we could hope
>>>> the instrument packages would have survived.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the real argument against primitive interstellar
>>>> probes: the "velocity" of technological advancement is
>>>> greater than the speed of primitive probes. In 200 years,
>>>> the 2600-year probe would be overtaken by a 800-year
>>>> probe. In another century, they would both be passed
>>>> by the "next-generation" system of propulsion, and so
>>>> forth. And by the time any of these probes could get there,
>>>> we might be able to go ourselves in a reasonable time
>>>> (by the ship's clocks).
>>>>
>>>> On the other hand, we might be able to make a 100-year
>>>> probe by the end of the century. For now, we need to
>>>> concentrate on survey and data collection technologies.
>>>>
>>>> For probe technology, I refer you to the 1973-78 study
>>>> by the British Interplanetary Society -- Project Daedalus.
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Daedalus
>>>> The project is currently being designed as Project Icarus:
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Icarus_%28Interstellar_Probe_Design_Study%29
>>>>
>>>> See also the 1987-88 study by NASA and the Air Force,
>>>> Project Longshot (good name)"
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Longshot
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sterling K. Webb
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Steve Dunklee"
>>>> To: ;
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 11:58 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] '100 percent' chance for life on newly
>>>> foundplanet?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Gee only 20 light years away. Since it would take an infinite amount
>>>> > of energy to accelerate a small mass to the speed of light. I guess
>>>> > the world may never know!
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > ______________________________________________
>>>> > Visit the Archives at
>>>> > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>>> > Meteorite-list mailing list
>>>> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>>> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> Visit the Archives at
>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> Visit the Archives at
>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu 07 Oct 2010 06:49:59 PM PDT