[meteorite-list] New Iron (Ataxite) SHRAPNEL

From: Gary Fujihara <fujmon_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 05:13:52 -1000
Message-ID: <EF4601C1-B5E8-45BD-ACAA-908DC73A62CF_at_mac.com>

Aloha Steve and list members,

Doubts regarding this new iron are understandable, particularly when only shrapnel fragments have been recovered near the crater. However, in a crater forming meteorite, individuals are usually not found near the crater vicinity but strewn further away since they are a product of early fragmentation. So individuals could be a part of this meteorite, but not discovered yet.

Secondly, have you seen the size of some of the fragments from this crater? They are huge! I am no munitions expert, but I would think that the largest WWII bombs would produce shrapnel the mass and thickness of the largest pieces.

Finally, please take a look at Mirko's beautifully prepared slices and endcuts. In them you will notice distinct inclusions that appear to be Shreibersite. Now, I have never known a man-made metal to have inclusions of Shreibersite in them.

Jilf al Kabir shrapnels available
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2067964&id=1394318075&l=57cb6b6699

Big Kahuna Meteorites (IMCA#1693)
105 Puhili Place, Hilo, Hawai'i 96720
http://bigkahuna-meteorites.com/
http://shop.ebay.com/fujmon/m.html
(808) 640-9161


On Jun 23, 2010, at 4:12 AM, Steve Schoner wrote:

> That would be a great find as a new ataxite (low nickel) with an impact crater. But until the analysis is in I have my doubts as the shrapnel part has me wondering...
>
> This area of the desert was most probably flown over by bombers back in WWII. Could that hole be the product of a bomb that was dropped? Bombers often unloaded hung up bombs in odd locations.
>
> At any rate if I were searching any area close to a WWII battlefield it would be wise to keep that in mind, as any unexploded ammo or even mines might still be active.
>
> Would not want any to be the last casualty of WWII.
>
> Steve Schoner
> www.petroslides.com
> IMCA #4470
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:04:49 -0400
> From: Mexicodoug <mexicodoug at aim.com>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New Iron (Ataxite) SHRAPNEL
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Message-ID: <8CCE0441CEA650F-9DC-529B at webmail-m092.sysops.aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
>
> Hi Svend, List,
>
> "Zooming out the sat-image, one notes that the general wind direction
> in the area
> is north by northeast to south to southwest. Thus, any Aeolian
> deflation or wind
> shaped sedimentation pattern around the crater would have to be
> oriented along
> this axis. This appears not to be case. Instead we see a radial pattern
> with the
> crater as its center."
>
> Svend has described poetry in motion; I am going to save his
> description for reruns with a cup of coffee and savour the detailed
> analysis, perhaps when life is at a kind moment and I am out in the
> desert observing the night sky and inventing my own constellations for
> family members.
>
> The impact rays are probably already covered quite well, but if it is
> not clear, let me try to add this:
>
> We have a central source of material and under Richard's hypothesis,
> wind blowing down points on the rim to form these "rays". We look at
> the rays and the first thing we notice is that they are as quite well
> defined. Svend's comments about the character of the prevailing wind
> direction, pavement and bedrock aside, let's try the strategy of proof
> by contradiction strictly under Richard's hypothesis:
>
> Suppose this is a sandy or powdery place where the wind can blow out
> spokes from the sand source(hole, crater, pit, whatever). Looking at
> the rays from all directions we are forced to reason that the wind must
> be blowing from all those directions or else we wouldn't have a hub and
> spoke design around the crater.
>
> But ... if the wind is blowing sand and powder spokes from all
> directions, why would the spokes be linear, nearly as well formed
> distally as near the crater? Because wind from all the directions of
> the compass would cause a scattering proportional to the distance from
> the crater, perhaps curves if it was a windstorm from another
> direction, and not a sharp delineation towards the ends of the rays
> like a bicycle wheel. The absence of this is a contradiction ... the
> backbones of the rays are too straight and well defined to support
> Richard's idea. A much simpler explanation is that someone painted them
> on a something solid ground - who better than Mother nature responding
> to the impact?
>
> Kindest wishes Svend, and Richard, thanks
> Doug
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Refinance Now 4.0% FIXED!
> $160,000 Mortgage for $633/mo. Free. No Obligation. Get 4 Quotes!
> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3341/4c221695111c213e178st03duc
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Wed 23 Jun 2010 11:13:52 AM PDT