[meteorite-list] Lorton, Smithsonian and "cool" scientists thinking
From: Paul H. <oxytropidoceras_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:39:51 -0600 Message-ID: <20100129163951.K9Y3U.477635.imail_at_eastrmwml28> Steve wrote: ?I am not sure of all of the reasons, and who made the actual decision to deny us and our audience the opportunity to see it first hand, but it seems that because the Smithsonian now has their own new cable TV network, and as such it is now their policy to not give any competing TV networks any access to shooting any of their stuff in their collections.? and ?Apparently, other networks have had severe access challenges lately in wanting to get footage of other national treasures since the Smithsonian cable network was formed. In our case it seems to be a real shame as it would have generated great PR for both our TV show and for the Smithsonian and for meteorites in general.? Having had a little dealing with the Smithsonian in matters, unrelated to meteorites, the impression that got is that with continuing cuts in their federal funding, the Smithsonian has had to more and more rely on generating income from private sources. One result of this is that in order to generate income to support the operation of the museum, many activities have been commercialized, including the selling of exclusive, first come, media rights to certain newsworthy events. I doubt that any ?prejudice against the collecting community? has anything to do with your treatment. It is simply that in order to generate income from private sources to replace federal budget cuts, they have sold the media rights to ?discoveries,? like the Lorton meteorite, to a private company. I suspect that it is an outside company, not the Smithsonian, who now make the decisions on such matters. I suspect that a number of the people at the Smithsonian are as unhappy as you are with this state of affairs. However, it would be a bad career move for anyone to either openly or privately disagree with, express any displeasure of, or violate the contracts / agreements that they have with various outside companies. This growing commercilization and turning research into commodities managed by outside companies is a growing trend ion many museums. Go read: Caveat Venditor? Museum Merchandising, Nonprofit Commercialization, and the Case of the Metropolitan Museum in New York by Stephen Teopler in ?International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations? at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/9229h92302851283/ MUSEUM MERCHANDISING: AN EXPLORATION OF ITS USES AND LIMITATIONS at: http://museumstudies.si.edu/Fellowships/toepler.html The cost of journal articles, like the above one, is another aspect of this problem. While working at an archaeological site, which I was working at and shall remain nameless, some friends of mine were prohibited from taking pictures of the site while visiting me because a well-known, national organization that was funding the dig had exclusive media rights as part of the funding agreement. Even I, theoretically was prohibited from taking my own personal pictures. However, since I actually worked there, people, the director just looked the other way. However, there were a couple of times when representatives from the funders were visiting, we all were told to hide our personal cameras for the duration of their visit. Yours, Paul H. Received on Fri 29 Jan 2010 04:39:51 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |