[meteorite-list] More on the Lorton... or Lorton hears a Who ?
From: Elizabeth Warner <warnerem_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:15:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1001290708340.32479_at_gaia.astro.umd.edu> Well, as a new person on the list, I was pretty surprised at the tone the list took for a few days after the Lorton fall... My first thought after reading some of the messages was "parasite, vulture"... And I nearly dropped my subscription. But I thought, well, I'm sure not all collectors are like that... Clear Skies! Elizabeth On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Richard Kowalski wrote: > I've been informed privately that it was apparently the Smithsonian that contacted the owner of the land and offering payment. > > I didn't mean to slight any hunter or dealer by my suggestion that one contacted the land owner... > > I'm a firm believer that sufficient samples need to be submitted for classification and research but I have a huge problem with some researchers that feel they need to horde every milligram for no reason other than to keep it out of the collector market. > > > -- > Richard Kowalski > http://fullmoonphotography.net > IMCA #1081 > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > Received on Fri 29 Jan 2010 07:15:22 AM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |