[meteorite-list] Quick Question about Sahara xxxxx finds
From: Michael Gilmer <meteoritemike_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:14:33 -0500 Message-ID: <AANLkTikAemzfyr=aD7aTshLur8TD9TEphrwchgjp-A4X_at_mail.gmail.com> Well, I had written a long and insightful reply pertaining to the original Sahara xxxx issue, but my laptop had a moment of stupidity and I lost the entire reply. I have no desire to completely re-type it out. A pity, since I think it was an effective statement about the duality of what is acceptable in the academic world and the "lay world". (*sigh*) On 12/19/10, Jeff Grossman <jgrossman at usgs.gov> wrote: > Parts of Algeria are included in the definition of NWA. > > As for export laws, you tell me! > > Jeff > > On 12/19/2010 11:34 AM, Greg Catterton wrote: >> Thanks for the info Jeff. I have a couple questions... >> >>> Algeria, Niger, and Libya were all possible collection >>> areas, and these are not in the NWA area, which is defined >>> as "Morocco and adjacent parts of the surrounding >>> countries." >> If this is the case, how do recent Lunars like NWA 2996, 4483 and 5151 >> become NWA stones when they were found in Algeria? >> Given export laws (however foolish they are) shouldnt these require export >> permits to own like Canadian and Argentina falls since Algeria does not >> allow export? >> >> Greg Catterton >> www.wanderingstarmeteorites.com >> IMCA member 4682 >> On Ebay: http://stores.shop.ebay.com/wanderingstarmeteorites >> On Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WanderingStarMeteorites >> >> >> --- On Sun, 12/19/10, Jeff Grossman<jgrossman at usgs.gov> wrote: >> >>> From: Jeff Grossman<jgrossman at usgs.gov> >>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Quick Question about Sahara xxxxx finds >>> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>> Date: Sunday, December 19, 2010, 7:44 AM >>> There are several issues and a >>> misconception here. >>> >>> Misconception: The Nomenclature Committee (NomCom) does not >>> change the names of meteorites once they are accepted, >>> except in extraordinary circumstances (e.g., the Gao/Guenie >>> nomenclatural nightmare). To do so would cause endless >>> confusion. All of the Nova meteorites were named that >>> way when they were initially published in the Bulletin. >>> >>> The "Sahara" series, which were collected and so-named by >>> the Labenne family, predates the "NWA" series by several >>> years. In the late 1997, the Sahara meteorites were >>> being sold under this name, several groups of scientists >>> wanted to publish on them, and the NomCom had to figure out >>> what to do about their names. The choices were to >>> accept these names, convince the Labennes to rename them, or >>> to rename them ourselves for the official >>> announcement. For several reasons, Sahara was >>> accepted. First, the names were already coming into >>> widespread use, and renaming them would cause a mess. >>> Second, it was understood that the coordinates would be >>> released, perhaps in five years, once the area was hunted >>> out (this never happened, but I still hope it will). >>> >>> The vote to establish the NWA series came in 2000, when it >>> became clear that the Saharan nomenclature problem was >>> growing in magnitude. It seems possible that, had the >>> Labenne meteorites appeared after this date, NomCom would >>> have insisted that they all be called NWA. But >>> probably not: we thought that Tunisia, eastern >>> Algeria, Niger, and Libya were all possible collection >>> areas, and these are not in the NWA area, which is defined >>> as "Morocco and adjacent parts of the surrounding >>> countries." >>> >>> Given all of this, probably the ideal names for the Labenne >>> meteorites would have been Sahara 001 - Sahara xxx, but what >>> was done was done. >>> >>> Jeff >>> >>> On 12/18/2010 2:25 PM, Greg Catterton wrote: >>>> Many will provide false information or not any at all >>> to keep the location secret. There is a discussion elsewhere >>> currently about a finder lying about the location to secure >>> the material available. >>>> Algeria has laws preventing the export of meteorites, >>> yet there are new ones coming out everyday. Even recent >>> Lunars from there are accepted and sold. All one has to do >>> is simply say NWA. >>>> Berduc was the same way, many were transported outside >>> the country and claimed to have been found elsewhere. >>>> I have seen many others questioned about locations and >>> even know of one person who has outright lied about where a >>> stone was recovered to keep from paying the land owner the >>> share agreed on and created a laughable story of the find >>> that has been published with so many flaws, it looks like a >>> scam ad on ebay. I bet some of you have a piece of it in >>> your collection and dont even know the whole story behind >>> it! >>>> I think it happens more then we would really want to >>> know. >>>> Greg Catterton >>>> www.wanderingstarmeteorites.com >>>> IMCA member 4682 >>>> On Ebay: http://stores.shop.ebay.com/wanderingstarmeteorites >>>> On Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WanderingStarMeteorites >>>> >>>> >>>> --- On Sat, 12/18/10, Michael Gilmer<meteoritemike at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>> From: Michael Gilmer<meteoritemike at gmail.com> >>>>> Subject: [meteorite-list] Quick Question about >>> Sahara xxxxx finds >>>>> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>>>> Date: Saturday, December 18, 2010, 1:51 PM >>>>> Hi Listees, >>>>> >>>>> I have a quick question for the group and maybe >>> someone >>>>> here can shed >>>>> some light on this subject.... >>>>> >>>>> Meteorites that do not have find coordinates or >>> have >>>>> falsified find >>>>> coordinates are typically given the "Nova" >>> designation by >>>>> NonCom or if >>>>> they are from Northwest Africa, they are given the >>> "NWA" >>>>> designation. >>>>> In a handful of cases, a named meteorite was later >>> changed >>>>> to a "Nova" >>>>> because it was discovered that the find >>> coordinates were >>>>> incorrect or >>>>> dubious. >>>>> >>>>> So, why after all of these years does the Sahara >>> xxxxx >>>>> finds (mostly >>>>> Labenne finds) are not referred to as "NWA" or >>>>> "Nova"? It is >>>>> well-known that the find coordinates on the many >>> of these >>>>> Labenne >>>>> Sahara finds are falsified, which has hurt science >>> and the >>>>> provenance >>>>> of the specimens. To this day, over a decade >>> later, >>>>> the true find >>>>> coordinates of these specimens have not been >>> revealed and >>>>> probably >>>>> will never be revealed. >>>>> >>>>> Can someone explain the double-standard at work >>> here? Is it because >>>>> of the pioneering work and otherwise-respectable >>> work that >>>>> the >>>>> Labennes have done - despite the falsification of >>> the find >>>>> locations? >>>>> Why do these Sahara finds get special treatment, >>> while >>>>> other finds >>>>> with dubious locations are lumped under "NWA" or >>> "Nova" ? >>>>> I realize the NWA designation did not exist when >>> the Sahara >>>>> finds were >>>>> accepted by NonCom, but shouldn't they now receive >>> the >>>>> Nova >>>>> designation? In fact, the NWA designation >>> was >>>>> created, in part, due >>>>> to the confusion created by the Sahara >>> finds. So why >>>>> do they still >>>>> get a special place in nomenclature after all of >>> this >>>>> time? >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> >>>>> MikeG >>>>> >>>>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Mike Gilmer - Galactic Stone& Ironworks >>> Meteorites >>>>> Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com >>>>> Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone >>>>> News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516 >>>>> Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone >>>>> Meteorite Top List - http://meteorite.gotop100.com >>>>> EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564 >>>>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> ______________________________________________ >>>>> Visit the Archives at >>>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>>>> >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> Visit the Archives at >>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >>>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> Visit the Archives at >>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >>> Meteorite-list mailing list >>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >>> >> >> >> ______________________________________________ >> Visit the Archives at >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> > > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Gilmer - Galactic Stone & Ironworks Meteorites Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516 Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone Meteorite Top List - http://meteorite.gotop100.com EOM - http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564 -----------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Sun 19 Dec 2010 12:14:33 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |