[meteorite-list] Dawn Journal - November 30, 2010 stupid question

From: Steve Dunklee <steve.dunklee_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 10:11:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <129811.54983.qm_at_web113914.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

This might be a stupid question but I was wondering if a future craft similar to this could use the ion propulsion unit to power the reaction wheels. And if the rection wheels or gyros are powered up to full speed before the launch if it could reduce the amount of energy neeeded? In addition a high powered maser could be used for attitude adjustment from earth or space withought using the energy aboard the craft. If designed correctly the craft could be repowered for attitude adjustment indefinately from earth instead of having to launch the energy from earth. Cheers Steve

On Fri Dec 3rd, 2010 6:39 PM EST Ron Baalke wrote:

>
>http://dawn.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/journal_11_30_10.asp
>
>Dawn Journal
>Dr. Marc Rayman
>November 30, 2010
>
>Dear Dawnizens of the Solar System,
>
>Dawn is maintaining its smooth and steady course through the solar
>system as it gradually closes in on Vesta. With the utmost patience and
>persistence, it continues thrusting with its ion propulsion system,
>heading toward its July rendezvous with the second most massive member
>of the main asteroid belt. Even as the spacecraft climbs farther from
>the sun, Earth's orbit is beginning to bring the planet closer to the
>probe.
>
>Having thrust for two-thirds of its time in space, Dawn has now achieved
>the velocity equivalent of about 5.5 kilometers per second (more than
>12,000 miles per hour). We have seen before that this does not represent the
>/actual/ change in speed, but it is still a very useful measure of the
>effect of the thrusting. Although it has long since surpassed the record
>for propulsive change in velocity, Dawn is only now at the halfway point in
>the planned profile of thrusting for its ambitious eight-year expedition.
>By the time it completes its mission at dwarf planet Ceres (the asteroid
>belt's most massive resident) in 2015, it will have accomplished twice the
>effective velocity change it has achieved so far.
>
>At the beginning of this month, mission controllers installed new
>parameters in the software used to control the spacecraft's orientation
>(which engineers refer to as "attitude") in the zero-gravity conditions
>of spaceflight. The attitude control system has four methods of keeping
>Dawn stable or turning to point in a new direction. When the spacecraft
>is not thrusting with the ion propulsion system, it has two techniques:
>it can rely on its reaction wheels or on its reaction control system.
>The wheels are gyroscope-like devices which, when electrically spun faster
>or slower, rotate (or stop the rotation of) the spacecraft. As we saw early
>last year, the reaction wheels alone are not sufficient, so when they are
>in operation, the reaction control jets also are used, although only
>occasionally. (The jets also are known as "thrusters," nomenclature used in
>previous logs, but to avoid confusion with the ion thrusters in this
>discussion, we will refer to them only as "jets.") The conventional rocket
>propellant hydrazine is fired through the jets to impart a small force to
>the ship, causing it to turn or to stop turning.
>
>Not content simply to coast through the solar system, as most
>interplanetary probes do, Dawn devotes the majority of the time to using
>one of its ion thrusters to change its course, constantly applying a
>light pressure to its orbit to bring it closer and closer to that of its
>destination. In addition to accelerating the ship, an ion thruster can
>be used to rotate it by slightly changing the angle of the thrust. This
>provides the attitude control system two other means of control when the
>spacecraft is in powered flight: it can use either the thruster plus the
>wheels (again with the occasional help of the reaction control system)
>or the thruster plus the more frequent use of the jets.
>
>Over the summer, engineers powered the reaction wheels off,
>preserving them for use in orbit around Vesta and Ceres. The reaction
>control system took over quite smoothly and has been keeping the craft
>stable ever since, most of the time in concert with the ion propulsion
>system.
>
>Even before deciding to deactivate the wheels for the rest of the
>interplanetary phases of the mission, engineers began working on a
>technique to use the hydrazine more efficiently, ensuring that the
>supply would last to the end of the long journey. When it left Earth
>more than three years ago, Dawn carried 45.6 kilograms (101 pounds)
>of hydrazine. It still has more than 38 kilograms (nearly 84 pounds)
>onboard, and frugal operators want to continue to use the precious
>resource sparingly. They devised a means to reduce the rate of
>propellant consumption when the reaction control
>system is the primary control method. (The expenditure of hydrazine
>during ion thrusting was already so low that there was no need for an
>improvement in that control mode.)
>
>The new control parameters were finalized after extensive analysis and
>simulation at Orbital Sciences Corporation and JPL. Without needing to
>change the software, operators radioed the values to Dawn in October and
>timed them to go into effect on Nov. 1 during the normal weekly hiatus
>in thrusting (and thus when attitude control is reliant exclusively on
>the jets) to point the main antenna to Earth. Thanks to this successful
>upgrade, the system now uses only about one-eighth as much hydrazine
>during those periods that it is holding steady and not applying ion thrust.
>
>To rotate from one attitude to another requires firing some jets to
>start the huge ship (the largest NASA has ever sent on an interplanetary
>voyage) turning and then others to stop it. To achieve a further savings
>in the hydrazine, controllers reduced the rate at which Dawn executes
>its turns. The standard speed had been a whiplash-inducing 0.1 degrees
>per second; that's the same pace at which the minute hand of a clock
>moves (except for some of the clocks sold in Dawn gift shops, and we're
>still processing your refund requests on those). On Nov. 1, the speed
>was lowered to half that, meaning less propellant is needed to initiate
>a rotation and less is needed to terminate it. The only turns in a
>typical week are those required to shift between the attitude required
>for ion thrusting and the attitude required for pointing the main
>antenna to Earth, and a little extra time spent turning is easily
>affordable.
>
>On Nov. 8, all four reaction wheels were powered on for a short time.
>For wheels 1, 2, and 3, this served as routine maintenance, keeping them
>in top condition so they will be ready to return to duty as the Vesta
>phase of the mission begins next summer. Running wheel 4 provided
>additional data on its condition so that engineers could assess its
>long-term prospects.
>
>Dawn is 0.083 AU (12 million kilometers or 7.7 million miles) from
>Vesta, its next destination. It is also 3.05 AU (456 million kilometers
>or 283 million miles) from Earth, or 1235 times as far as the moon and
>3.09 times as far as the sun. Radio signals, traveling at the universal
>limit of the speed of light, take 51 minutes to make the round trip.
>
>______________________________________________
>Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>Meteorite-list mailing list
>Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



      
Received on Sat 04 Dec 2010 01:11:02 PM PST