[meteorite-list] WAS Cyanobacteria in meteorites? NOW: Life in Meteorites
From: Meteorites USA <eric_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:39:48 -0700 Message-ID: <4C703994.7060208_at_meteoritesusa.com> Hi Adam, I think eventually the scientific community will embrace it. A large collection of highly intelligent minds think rather slowly apparently. ;) Patience... Historically there's a process of belief vs proof and that helps hypothesis and theory to evolves into self evident fact.. At first people are not receptive and it gets ignored, then they argue against it, then it becomes plausible, and finally it becomes a viable theory, which in turn becomes fact based on empirical evidence. Only then will something become "accepted". Like I said before, the evidence of extraterrestrial life is growing. You mention Mars and exploration... I found this the other day. Symphony of Science - The Case For Mars http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZ5sWfhkpE0 Enjoy... Eric On 8/21/2010 1:17 PM, Adam Hupe wrote: > Martian meteorite NWA 998 displays an abundance of these "fossils" and is > proving to be much richer than ALH84001: > > If the scientific community ever completely embraces the idea, then we will > witness another surge in the importance they represent. In any case, all of the > talk of Martian fossils and life helped lift Mars into the forefront making it > easier to justify all of the missions taking place there. In my opinion, > ALH84001 and the scientists who studied it are mostly responsible for the > renewed interest in Mars. > > > Here is a link to a recent article on NWA 998: > http://skymania.com/wp/2010/04/new-meteorite-clues-to-life-on-mars.html > > Best Regards, > > Adam > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Meteorites USA<eric at meteoritesusa.com> > To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > Sent: Sat, August 21, 2010 12:15:39 PM > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] WAS Cyanobacteria in meteorites? NOW: Life in > Meteorites > > Perhaps... But, are you referring to the "Orgueil" meteorite claim of fossilized > bacteria, Murchison, or the whole claim of fossilized microbial life in > meteorites all together? > > We already know that microbial life can survive in space. The question is for > how long. > > The conclusion sounds accurate enough to say... > > Plausible: Life is not restricted to Earth, nor is there evidence that says > empirically that life could NOT survive in the harshness of space. In fact there > is more evidence that suggested it's probable than not. > > Based on the fact that it has already been observed that life can survive in > space without the insulative protection that asteroid, meteoroid, or ejecta > material could provide. Look at this: > http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1998/ast01sep98_1/#anchor179666 > > > Granted that's only 2.6 years, and we brought it back to Earth. What's to say it > wouldn't have survived in the camera longer if left alone, or if it were > cocooned within the safe confines of a meteoroid or asteroid that it couldn't > survive for millions of years. > > There's an interesting article on survival of microbes in space in the Journal > of Cosmology titled "Microbial Survival Mechanisms and the Interplanetary > Transfer of Life Through Space." > http://journalofcosmology.com/Panspermia9.html > > And the Plausibility of Martian Microbes - Which was posted/linked to on the > Met-List in 2004 > http://www.mail-archive.com/meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com/msg21972.html > Original Article: > http://www.astrobio.net/pressrelease/941/plausibility-of-martian-microbes > > Also good reads from LPI, NASA, and Astrobiology Magazine. > > Fossil Life in ALH 84001? > http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lpi/meteorites/life.html > > Evidence of Ancient Martian Life in Meteorite ALH84001? > http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/marslife.html > > And these articles on extremophiles and other extreme life propagating environs: > http://www.astrobio.net/hottopic_origins_extremelife.php > > The evidence of life transfer from reputable sources is growing. > > The more we learn about meteorites the more we realize that they are the key to > understanding everything. > > Regards, > Eric > > > > > On 8/21/2010 10:18 AM, Charles O'Dale wrote: > >> Apparently this is a hoax, sorry about that guys !! : ( >> >> Chuck >> http://ottawa-rasc.ca/wiki/index.php?title=Odale-Articles >> >> >> >> ----- Forwarded Message ---- >> >> >>> From: Charles O'Dale<codale0806 at rogers.com> >>> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>> Sent: Fri, August 20, 2010 8:35:04 AM >>> Subject: Cyanobacteria in meteorites? >>> >>> http://www.panspermia.org/hoover4.htm >>> >>> >>> >> ______________________________________________ >> Visit the Archives at >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> >> >> > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > Received on Sat 21 Aug 2010 04:39:48 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |