[meteorite-list] Wisconsin Prices
From: Martin Altmann <altmann_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 03:15:35 +0200 Message-ID: <002b01cae8cb$d0c49630$07b22959_at_name86d88d87e2> Hi there, I can write even longer mails... Well, I'm no native speaker, but in reading Jason's posting, I had the same sensation like Darryl, that it was meant somewhat condescending... ...or better to say, that it was the good ol' comfort but nevertheless outdated dealers-bashing. ------ "I'm legitimately worried by this change that's taking place. People seem genuinely more interested in the money of meteorites than what got me interested in them all those years ago." " I wouldn't expect anything less from a dealer, with few exceptions." " Yes, you might get a few dollars less per gram." "If not...cutting up stones for money" "In most cases, dealers give the same small samples to science because they want to sell as much as they can." "- hell, he'd probably get more out of it per gram if he did, selling it in mg-sized samples." "I understand that you're thinking differently than at least some dealers now" "chasing down falls for the money of it has been such a common theme recently that I felt" "It just seems as though very few people are doing it for the love of it anymore." "The story reminds me of quite a few, to be honest: dealer chases down new fall/find, finds it, cuts it up, sells it." "I'll take it quietly while a dealer dices with no pretext [to make money]," "Is it really the dream of most people out there to simply find a new fall for the cash in it?" ----- Fie! Jason. You know what? All these hunters and dealers, most time of the year not at home, going around twice, three times around the globe per year, for the tiny chance to find a stone or two. All those people walking every free minute, under the sun, eating dust, hundreds and thousands miles, all these people doing the fieldwork, trying to narrow down a fireball, all this people gambling with their own hard-earned money (and often enough with their health too), often enough returning with empty hands.. ...do you really think they could do that, if they wouldn't LOVE meteorites? Where are you taking the pretension from, that they should pursue their profession pro bono or for the good of their health? You might be not used to that, cause you will work later in a tax-funded environment, but there is no difference to a carpenter, to run a shop or an enterprise (else than meteorite hunting/dealing is more difficult as we talking about the rarest matter on the planet). Each hunter or dealer has to pay his bills, his taxes, his expenses, his costs and he has additionally to make a living from his work. Won't repeat myself, once I wrote a lengthy email to this list, what all for expenses a person selling meteorites has to bear, to give an idea. Was highly appreciated by a veteran dealer, hence unsuspicious to be a greedy barbarian, right Al? They have their needs to be able to work in that weird field, the field of their dreams and their enthusiasm. That's btw the reason for quite all meteorites found by privateers being so much cheaper than any found by an university expedition, cause the hunters and dealers have to calculate. And to destroy your romanticism: when I was a boy, these few selected dealers you might have meant, a Haag, a Zeitschel, a New, a Carion.. - they were always selling slices and cuts, also small ones. And a Krantz, a Ward, a Foote, a Haag, as well as the first pioneers in the deserts and many more, who filled the institutional collections, they were two-fisted dealers, full stop. Difference to today is that meteorites are bringing not the money anymore, they were paid with in past... ...btw. I noted that it becomes more and more fashionable to have a nice "meteorite men"-bashing too. Gosh they are selling their Brenhams cheaper than a Nininger ever did. Why? Cause they found so much. Why did they found so many? Cause they worked hard. Good work. And the second difference is, that the museums, yes also in USA, don't spend the millions anymore for meteorites, like they did in past. Then it was of course easier to sell entire pieces and finds. And such a lock, stock and barrel! Of course the hunters, dealers and collectors are keeping their nicest recoveries. But not all are maybe in your comfort financial situation to do it always. Costs are running, or if a spare-time hunter sells to finance his passion, what's wrong with that? I don't know Joe. If he sells, for paying a part of the education of his sons or if he needs a new car or a vacation, whatever, who would dare to remonstrate with him on selling the stone? I fully believe, that it wasn't such an easy decision for Joe to give the stone away. You know what the difference between you and Joe is? Joe dropped everything immediately and went on the hunt! And he was lucky. You could have found that very stone, but you didn't, you even didn't try. So I don't understand why you made a comment about Joe at all. And this stone-old cutting debate, which we had a dozen times on the list. For me it's always remarkable, that those, wagging the moralistic finger most disgustedly are so often exactly these, who, if asked then, why they hadn't bought the entire stone, were telling highly astonished: Me? Why me? Good heavens! So why didn't you buy Joe's stone? Or why haven't you suggested to your university to buy the stone, if it was so beautiful, that it was worth so many lines, you wrote? I'm sure Joe wouldn't have any problem to give the stone to you, (probably he would have been very happy, if the stone could have remained intact) as no offerer has any problem to sell his stones complete likewise and to save all that work and time of cutting, polishing, marketing, completions of sales and the cut loss and and and... Btw. Where was your outcry about Kosice?! Seen the finds per man-hour it must have been a shower richer than Wisconsin! Can't remember any fall in whole Europe in my 30 years of collecting, which produced so many individuals. I heard the official team ended the search, cause they think they have found enough or because it's too laborious or whatever. By law it is strictly forbidden to FIND more stones, it is even forbidden to look for them, I was told. Well and therefore sooo many stones and maybe also the main mass is sentenced to rot and to decay in the soil. Btw nice area, you saw Marcin's photos? I think the farmers, the guesthouses and inns, the shops could have need such a fine extra income like Livingston had, the local schools some expert lessons, the local museums some donated stones, the families a heirloom handed over from generation to generation with the story...and the tourist managers tear their hair, because such an worldwide attention they could have had and which they will get once in a thousand years, such a campaign is really priceless! So not only the scientific, but also the economic damage for the region is very high. That is a ways more hefty destruction to worry about than to cut any stone. Therefore we should be glad and happy, that such people like Joe are hunting and finding the living stones of Livingston. Thou shall NOT take this all as personal affront, Jason! I felt only obligated to write something - and that's why I also came with Kosice - because: It is exactly that grotesque caricature of collectors, dealers, hunters as greedy and unscrupulous people running around with $$-signs as pupils, willing to sell even their grandmothers in case, - combined with the ignorance of the requirements needed at all for meteorites being found, which causes these for all parties disastrous laws. Best! Martin Received on Fri 30 Apr 2010 09:15:35 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |