[meteorite-list] Chondritic parent bodies
From: Jeff Grossman <jgrossman_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:47:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4AA7F827.4010409_at_usgs.gov> Backing up and extending what Alan said, in current usage, a slash means one of two things: 1) there are properties of this meteorite that are intermediate or transitional between the two classes, or 2) The classifier could not decide which group it was due to some kind of limitation in methodology or samples. In the case of Holbrook, it is the first meaning. A variety of properties have been measured that put Holbrook near the L/LL boundary, including O isotopes and metal composition. So what does that mean? Nobody knows. Either the L and LL asteroids had overlapping properties, in which case we don't know which was originally home to Holbrook, or there are other asteroids with intermediate properties that could be the parent of Holbrook. The L and LL groups are not particularly well resolved from each other in many properties, although it is certain they are not all from one asteroid. I am confident that quite a number of classified L chondrites are from the LL body and vice versa, and not just limited to the ones that are called L/LL. Jeff Dave Gheesling wrote: > Bernd, Alan, and List, > Thank you both for the diplomatic and informative responses. While we're on > the subject, might one of you (or anyone else) expand on, say, the L/LL6 > classification designation? Holbrook was recently moved from an L6 to such > a classification, and I have a few others in my collection which are not > breccias (and presumably are entirely from one parent body and not two) but > yet have this classification assigned to them...which, "by definition," > would imply connection with both the L and LL parent bodies, presumably > anyway. > Thanks, and all best, > Dave > www.fallingrocks.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com > [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of > bernd.pauli at paulinet.de > Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 12:47 PM > To: Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > Subject: [meteorite-list] Chondritic parent bodies > > Hello Dave, Alan, and List, > > Here is a paper that may be of interest with regard to LL chondrite parent > bodies: > > Dixon E.T., Bogard D.D. and Garrison D.H. (2002) 40Ar-39Ar Chronology of LL > Chondrites (Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIII, 1114.pdf). > > They even discuss *three* models: > > 1. The onion-shell model > 2. The rubble-pile model > 3. The re-assembly model > > > Best wishes, > > Bernd > > > > ______________________________________________ > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > ______________________________________________ > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > -- Dr. Jeffrey N. Grossman phone: (703) 648-6184 US Geological Survey fax: (703) 648-6383 954 National Center Reston, VA 20192, USAReceived on Wed 09 Sep 2009 02:47:03 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |