[meteorite-list] Alien Contact Predicted
From: Martin Altmann <altmann_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:08:05 +0200 Message-ID: <002601ca2812$df96e110$177f2a59_at_name86d88d87e2> Come on, Darren. Phil only has to return: Science is the new religion. And he wouldn't be that wrong. "Nobody knows what life is" he writes. Big thing, if I ask my cat, she says: eating, sleeping and a sparklet of magic, stupid! If there is life out there, I rather would ask, will we ever know about? Gosh, I read of travels to other stars, of mankind colonizing other worlds... My doubts I have. Our own experiences are, that so far no culture or civilization existed long enough, to be able to manage such gigantic endeavours. Some hundred thousands years we were sitting in trees, in the plains, in caves. Raise and fall. How long lasted Babylon, Egypt, how long the Roman Empire... USA, French Revolution just happened 200 years ago. Civilizations grow and they fall in pieces. Even in the so short history of human existence they were so far nothing more than flickering bubbles. Wherefrom that optimism? Homo erectus? 2.000.000 my? Sapiens 120.000 years? And we have 50 years of television advertising. And half of us are still sitting in caves. I guess, we are somewhat to impatient, aren't we? Let's meet in 300,000 years, then we can continue to call us names like creationist or conehead. Best! Martin -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Darren Garrison Gesendet: Freitag, 28. August 2009 21:37 An: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Alien Contact Predicted On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:13:40 -0400, you wrote: >nothing but conjecture based on beliefs. Your belief in alien life forms >sounds religious to me, like you have faith in something you know ain't so. I don't have "belief in alien life forms"-- I simply do not have a conviction that the conditions under which life can form are so utterly rare that there will not be more than one example in all of the universe. > >The probabality of life popping into existence out of non living matter is >the smallest unit of measure above zero. Just think about it, it's not >alive, poof!, it's alive. This only proves the profound depth of your ignorance. Are you really suggesting that people think a full, living cell spontaneously generated? More than ever, I'm thinking you are a creationist. You sure use plenty of their retoric. "Life" is a fuzzy term-- it is easy to look at extremes and pick if they are alive or they are not. An elephant? Alive. A brick? Not alive. But there is not a sharp transition between life and non-life. Is a virus alive, or not? There are well educated scientists who argue on both sides of that. What about a prion? It is capable of converting other proteins to it's own malformed shape. Is a prion alive? You want to understand what scientists think about the origin of life? Stop your own mental masturbating and pick up a few books, because you are sorely ignorant in the area. I will ask you point blank, and if you don't answer, then you have answered it with your silence: Do you think life began naturally on Earth, or do you believe it was "created?" Because, if the latter, there is no longer room for science-based discussion. ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Fri 28 Aug 2009 03:08:05 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |