[meteorite-list] Unusual new lunar or hokum?

From: Patricia Harris <meteorhound_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 16:17:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <123495.45498.qm_at_web59612.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>

Back in 2005 Ted Bunch confirmed this specimen as a 100% meteorite, and he was suppose to classify this meteorite, and publish it. I waited 9 months for classification but Ted never completed it. Since then many tests have been completed to support my classification for this Lunar meteorite specimen. All tests completed offer facts and support for my classification. The Mineral Chemistry End Members, and Isotopic measurements Oxygen Isotopes are all within Lunar Mineralogy, and Lunar Isotopic fields. Geochemists, and Scientists have studied this Lunar Specimen , and they are in agreement with my classification. If you have other questions please feel free to contact me. Mitch Minor office (815)740-3834 cell(815)545-5803


--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Ted Bunch <tbear1 at cableone.net> wrote:

> From: Ted Bunch <tbear1 at cableone.net>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Unusual new lunar or hokum?
> To: michael_w_gilmer at yahoo.com, meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Date: Monday, November 3, 2008, 4:06 PM
> Hi Mike - I concur, the whole picture looks strange to me. A
> 5 ton lunar
> meteorite in one piece? Where were the O2 analyses done?
> There are only a
> few trustworthy labs that can do O2 analyses. In any case,
> I don't think the
> reported O2 data are that discriminating between lunar and
> terrestrial.
> Some of the mineralogy looks OK, some does not. The plotted
> major oxide
> compositional data look impressive for lunar origin, but
> there are
> terrestrial mafic compositions that are just as
> lunar-looking. The hand
> sample surface is very irregular and looks more like a
> weathered terrestrial
> surface than fusion crust.
>
> Looks like a duck, walks like a duck, but it doesn't
> quack like a duck. My
> advice is to wait until it has been officially classified
> and/or Randy
> Korotev has looked it over before buying a piece. I also
> suggest that the
> Starchaser group do FeO/MnO ratios on olivine and pyroxene.
> These ratios are
> discriminating and can save everyone a lot of trouble. My
> guess is that this
> "lunar" is a glacial erratic from Canada.
>
> Buyer beware,
>
> Ted Bunch
>
>
>
>
> On 11/3/08 7:06 AM, "Michael Gilmer"
> <michael_w_gilmer at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Group!
> >
> > I ran across this one on eBay today :
> >
> >
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=350119620351
> >
> > Something about it doesn't ring true.
> >
> > There is a lot of quasi-scientific mumbo jumbo in the
> listing.
> >
> > Is this for real or some highly-misinformed
> individual?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > MikeG
> >
> >
> >
> .........................................................
> > Michael Gilmer (Louisiana, USA)
> > Member of the Meteoritical Society.
> > Member of the Bayou Region Stargazers Network.
> > Websites - http://www.galactic-stone.com and
> http://www.glassthrower.com
> > MySpace -
> http://www.myspace.com/fine_meteorites_4_sale
> >
> ..........................................................
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> >
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


      
Received on Mon 03 Nov 2008 07:17:44 PM PST