[meteorite-list] Space junk - marine life - shame on NASA

From: Greg Catterton <star_wars_collector_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:43:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <797082.73145.qm_at_web45605.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>

no "hip shot" was intended. I was basing my opinions on reports I have read concerning this and as I have said before, I am not as experienced at these things as some of you are and the reports I read made it out to be a major health risk to people if it was a land impact.
that said, I figured the health risk to marine life would have been the same.
I am not out to blast NASA or the atronaut, I just did not understand why they could not have simply returned it in a shuttle that was returning to earth.



--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Greg Hupe <gmhupe at htn.net> wrote:

> From: Greg Hupe <gmhupe at htn.net>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Space junk - marine life - shame on NASA
> To: "Chris Peterson" <clp at alumni.caltech.edu>
> Cc: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Date: Monday, November 3, 2008, 2:35 PM
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thank you for replying in a short and easy way to describe
> the objects size
> being trackable. I won't begin to pretend to know about
> these things. The
> initial comment seemed like as hip-shot and I didn't
> think NASA or the
> astronaut deserved it.
>
> Best regards,
> Greg
>
> ====================
> Greg Hupe
> The Hupe Collection
> NaturesVault (eBay)
> gmhupe at htn.net
> www.LunarRock.com
> IMCA 3163
> ====================
> Click here for my current eBay auctions:
> http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZnaturesvault
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Peterson"
> <clp at alumni.caltech.edu>
> To: "Greg Hupe" <gmhupe at htn.net>
> Cc: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 2:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Space junk - marine life -
> shame on NASA
>
>
> > Hi Greg-
> >
> > This thing was, in fact, deliberately discarded with
> the knowledge that it
> > would reenter. It posed no risk to anything else
> because it was large
> > enough to track, in a known orbit, and was sure to
> have a short lifetime
> > in space. It had no potential to produce any
> additional debris.
> >
> > This isn't the first thing they scuttled from the
> ISS.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > *****************************************
> > Chris L Peterson
> > Cloudbait Observatory
> > http://www.cloudbait.com
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Greg Hupe" <gmhupe at htn.net>
> > To: <star_wars_collector at yahoo.com>
> > Cc: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 12:10 PM
> > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Space junk - marine life
> - shame on NASA
> >
> >
> >> Hello Greg,
> >>
> >> Where do you read that an astronaut, "..threw
> it (ammonia tank) overboard
> >> (from the International Space Station) during a
> space walk in July
> >> 2007."? I find it highly unlikely that
> material would be purposely tossed
> >> into space to potentially be a floating target for
> future spacecraft
> >> and/or satellites to hit. I do not think NASA has
> the same mindset that
> >> some cruise ship operators have by throwing their
> bags of trash into the
> >> ocean.
> >>
> >> My thoughts!
> >> Greg
> >
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


      
Received on Mon 03 Nov 2008 02:43:01 PM PST