[meteorite-list] Bad Science on ancient meteorite impactor?

From: Darren Garrison <cynapse_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:25:58 -0500
Message-ID: <4bl2v3dhi54mdkt3q3c4orqb0mtkr4mdi7_at_4ax.com>

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:33:13 -0400, you wrote:

>I don't agree with most of these conclusions. I motion to have this
>work peer reviewed by meteoriticists. Do I hear a second?
>
>-mt
>
>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-03/uob-cct033108.php
>

Seen several spins on this story. Definitely needs to be taken with a whole
pillar of salt.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/31/kofels_asteroid/
Received on Mon 31 Mar 2008 05:25:58 PM PDT


Help support this free mailing list:



StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
reddit
Yahoo MyWeb