[meteorite-list] Bad Science on ancient meteorite impactor?
From: Darren Garrison <cynapse_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:25:58 -0500 Message-ID: <4bl2v3dhi54mdkt3q3c4orqb0mtkr4mdi7_at_4ax.com> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:33:13 -0400, you wrote: >I don't agree with most of these conclusions. I motion to have this >work peer reviewed by meteoriticists. Do I hear a second? > >-mt > >http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-03/uob-cct033108.php > Seen several spins on this story. Definitely needs to be taken with a whole pillar of salt. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/31/kofels_asteroid/ Received on Mon 31 Mar 2008 05:25:58 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |