[meteorite-list] March 4 RSPOD Oriented (sic) 32kg stone
From: Rob Wesel <rob_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 19:50:53 -0800 Message-ID: <009601c87e74$1cef4c90$6501a8c0_at_windows9bb74fe> "not that it has become good reference point for collectors, new and old." I beg to differ Don, or did you not "edit" your description Rob Wesel http://www.nakhladogmeteorites.com ------------------ We are the music makers... and we are the dreamers of the dreams. Willy Wonka, 1971 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Rawlings" <psc2410xi at yahoo.com> To: "Mr EMan" <mstreman53 at yahoo.com>; "metlist" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 4:42 AM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] March 4 RSPOD Oriented (sic) 32kg stone > Not only is it not oriented. The RSPOD has a > responsibility to "edit" questionable descriptions not > that it has become good reference point for > collectors, new and old. > > My vote is to change the description. > > Don > > --- Mr EMan <mstreman53 at yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Ok would someone that believes this is an accurate >> caption please >> defend it. >> >> "Sean Northover, a student at Kennesaw Mountain >> High School, >> confirming the weight of a fresh, ">>>ORIENTED<<<" >> 32.6 kg >> chondrite"??? >> <http://www.rocksfromspace.org/March_4_2008.html> >> This is too early >> for April 1st. >> >> To let bad and really bad psuedoscience take over >> all we had to do was >> continue being silent on dubious claims. Now every >> other meteorite we >> see is "oriented". We know this is the truth >> because any new commer, >> meteorite owner, is magically, over night, an >> "expert" at identifying >> and describing meteorite surface features. >> >> If anyone wishes to declare a meteorite "oriented"-- >> anyone may do so >> without a pittance of proof and no one on this list >> will ever object. >> Because we refuse to define "oriented". >> >> Ergo, I have a perfect sphere meteorite that fell >> from my table to the >> floor and under the imagination that makes EVERY >> single meteorite >> "oriented" I can proclaim that my sphere is oriented >> having traveled >> through the atmosphere. Given the wide latitude >> used in claiming >> orientation no one can disprove that I am not >> correct. >> >> (OH YEAH and it has perfect fusion crust because >> its drop was extended >> for several seconds over a candle flame before >> reaching the floor). >> >> I can proclaim it as a fully oriented, fully fusion >> crusted, >> sphere-shaped "fall" and under the unfettered >> latitude we allow amongst >> meteorite collectors no one can prove my description >> wrong. >> >> So is this a hobby or a study of science? >> >> Continually Baffled, >> Elton >> ______________________________________________ >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> > > > Don Rawlings > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Looking for last minute shopping deals? > Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. > http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping > > ______________________________________________ > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Tue 04 Mar 2008 10:50:53 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |