[meteorite-list] March 4 RSPOD Oriented (sic) 32kg stone
From: Dave Gheesling <dave_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 07:47:46 -0500 Message-ID: <5261E37910ED427D97E1B512EE322628_at_meteorroom> Happy to confirm this, Elton, as this specimen is in my collection and I'm looking at it right now. You can go to www.fallingrocks.com, click the sign on the home page, click the smaller sign on the collection page (to "All"), scroll down to NWA XXX and you will find anterior and posterior images of it there. It should be fairly obvious, but the lumpy and extremely thick crust on the trailing face might be the best indication for you as these photos were taken rather quickly. It will be in classification shortly and thus moved out of the XXX category when nomenclature is assigned. The point of the photograph, by the way, was the wonderful reaction these students have to an opportunity to directly interact with meteorite specimens, and we had just discussed flight orientation in this magnate class; it was not about the meteorite itself. Best regards, Dave -----Original Message----- From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Mr EMan Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 2:09 AM To: metlist Subject: [meteorite-list] March 4 RSPOD Oriented (sic) 32kg stone Ok would someone that believes this is an accurate caption please defend it. "Sean Northover, a student at Kennesaw Mountain High School, confirming the weight of a fresh, ">>>ORIENTED<<<" 32.6 kg chondrite"??? <http://www.rocksfromspace.org/March_4_2008.html> This is too early for April 1st. To let bad and really bad psuedoscience take over all we had to do was continue being silent on dubious claims. Now every other meteorite we see is "oriented". We know this is the truth because any new commer, meteorite owner, is magically, over night, an "expert" at identifying and describing meteorite surface features. If anyone wishes to declare a meteorite "oriented"-- anyone may do so without a pittance of proof and no one on this list will ever object. Because we refuse to define "oriented". Ergo, I have a perfect sphere meteorite that fell from my table to the floor and under the imagination that makes EVERY single meteorite "oriented" I can proclaim that my sphere is oriented having traveled through the atmosphere. Given the wide latitude used in claiming orientation no one can disprove that I am not correct. (OH YEAH and it has perfect fusion crust because its drop was extended for several seconds over a candle flame before reaching the floor). I can proclaim it as a fully oriented, fully fusion crusted, sphere-shaped "fall" and under the unfettered latitude we allow amongst meteorite collectors no one can prove my description wrong. So is this a hobby or a study of science? Continually Baffled, Elton ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Tue 04 Mar 2008 07:47:46 AM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |