[meteorite-list] More on Mitchell's Aliens

From: Michael L Blood <mlblood_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:44:07 -0700
Message-ID: <C4B2B8C7.18803%mlblood_at_cox.net>

Darren and all,
        While there can be little doubt that the "brobe" routine is the
modern era's version of Incubi and Sucubi, various reports have
Preceded Mitchell's comments (and remember, all the astronauts
Were the most highly screened group for "sanity" and overall
"neurosis free" group that may ever have existed).
        My mother worked on a Navy base for 22 years and an officer
She knew well and considered totally sane swore he knew for a fact
That there were 2 alien bodies and one survivor who lived a couple
of months after the Roswell event.
        Anyway.... Once again..... Is this really list material - I guess
MAYBE so in a very abstract manor.
        I just do not find it easy to totally disregard the very calmly
Spoken word of an astronaut just because our current Paradigm
Prohibits faster than light travel.
        I remember reading several years ago that MIT researchers
Had discovered sub-atomic particles that "appeared to move faster
Than the speed of light" and when they encouraged other researchers
Around the globe to repeat their tests those researchers also discovered
Sub-atomic particles that "appeared to move faster than the speed of
Light."
        I remember someone said (Carl Sagan?) that any technology
sufficiently advanced from a given culture would appear to that culture's
Members to be "magic."
        I am not advocating yes or no on the alien issue, but I do find it
interesting that so many people would dismiss any thought of aliens
out of hand. But people always amaze me the way they dismiss any
evidence that does not fit their own "map" of reality.
This makes it very difficult, of course, to adapt to new data.
        Best wishes, Michael


on 7/27/08 11:01 PM, Darren Garrison at cynapse at charter.net wrote:

> Okay, in an attempt to be more fair to the guy, I'll give the benifit of the
> doubt that what he is talking about might be radically different from the pop
> culture idea of alien contacts supposed to have happened over the past half
> century or so. Maybe these "contact" details have been completely covered up
> for all this time in a stunning display of government competence (three can
> keep
> a secret, as long as two are dead). I'll hold out the slim chance of that.
>
> But if this guy is talking about the purile drivel that is the lore of the UFO
> believers today-- including the aliens being humans with trivial morphological
> differences, who go around kidnapping people and sticking objects in their
> anuses, mutulating cattle, buzzing aircraft, and making crop circles, well,
> that
> means he is firmly a nut. Not because the details of the stories are too
> bizzare, but because they are too prosaic-- the very-slightly-alien aliens
> with
> their very-slightly-alien activities seem to be the imaginings of
> poorly-educated hicks and rednecks with limited imaginations-- and probably
> are.
> ______________________________________________
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Going to church doesn't make you a Christian any more than
standing in a garage makes you a car.
Received on Mon 28 Jul 2008 02:44:07 AM PDT