[meteorite-list] Cosmogentic dating, and bad science on ancient meteorite impactor?

From: Darren Garrison <cynapse_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:50:41 -0500
Message-ID: <93l7v3dhq4n672c0di70chu9po996h577t_at_4ax.com>

On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:

>
>They dismiss the radiocarbon dates by claiming that the wood samples
>were somehow magically ?contaminated? by the impact. I say ?magically?,
>because there is not a practical way that an impact, especially an imaginary
>one, could have contaminated the wood samples buried by the landslide.
>

There is a simpler way to identify the story as flawed-- it is published by
Adventures Unlimited.

http://www.adventuresunlimitedpress.com/

(The common thread between all Adventures Unlimited publications-- all fringe
crap that would never see the light of day with a mainstream publisher).
Received on Wed 02 Apr 2008 02:50:41 PM PDT