[meteorite-list] A question about crust.

From: JKGwilliam <h3chondrite_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:45:55 -0700
Message-ID: <20071111054603.YOHZ5967.fed1rmmtao103.cox.net_at_fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>

I agree. Any chips that are deep enough to show matrix should be
listed, at best, as 99%, and drop in value from there. Like so many
other terms in the business of meteorites ( e.g. fusion crust,
oriented ) the claim of 100% crusted if often misused.


Best,
John

At 08:45 PM 11/10/2007, Bob Evans wrote:
>100 % shouldn't be debatable ----- Original Message ----- From:
>"Thomas Webb" <webbth1 at yahoo.com>
>To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
>Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 9:42 PM
>Subject: [meteorite-list] A question about crust.
>
>
>>List members,
>>I notice that some sellers list a meteorite as 100%
>>crusted if it apparently had 100% crust during flight
>>but now has several chips of crust missing. My
>>feeling has always been that 100% crust should signify
>>that it is totally crusted with none missing. Can we
>>get a consensus of what constitutes 100% crust?
>>Thanks,
>>Thomas
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>http://mail.yahoo.com ______________________________________________
>>Meteorite-list mailing list
>>Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>______________________________________________
>Meteorite-list mailing list
>Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Sun 11 Nov 2007 12:45:55 AM PST